Phylogenetic positions of several amitochondriate protozoa |
| |
Authors: | He?De,Jiuhong?Dong,Jianfan?Wen author-information" > author-information__contact u-icon-before" > mailto:wenjf@mail.kiz.ac.cn" title=" wenjf@mail.kiz.ac.cn" itemprop=" email" data-track=" click" data-track-action=" Email author" data-track-label=" " >Email author,Dedong?Xin,Siqi?Lu |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Biosystems Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Hayama, Kanagawa, 240-0193, Japan;(2) Department of Physics, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-0084, Japan;(3) The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA;(4) Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, 305-8572, Japan;(5) Present address: Department of Molecular Protozoology, Research Institute for Microbial Disease, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan;(6) Present address: Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata , 950-2181, Japan;(7) Present address: Public Health Research Institute, Newark, NJ 07103, USA; |
| |
Abstract: | Several groups of parasitic protozoa, as represented by Giardia, Trichomonas, En-tamoeba and Microsporida, were once widely considered to be the most primitive extant eukaryotic group—Archezoa. The main evidence for this is their ‘lacking mitochondria’ and possessing some other primitive features between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and being basal to all eukaryotes with mitochondria in phylogenies inferred from many molecules. Some authors even proposed that these organisms diverged before the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria within eukaryotes. This view was once considered to be very significant to the study of origin and evolution of eukaryotic cells (eukaryotes). However, in recent years this has been challenged by accumulating evidence from new studies. Here the sequences of DNA topoisomerase II in G. lamblia, T. vaginalis and E. histolytica were identified first by PCR and sequencing, then combining with the sequence data of the microsporidia Encephalitozoon cunicul and other eukaryotic groups of different evolutionary positions from GenBank, phylogenetic trees were constructed by various methods to investigate the evolutionary positions of these amitochondriate protozoa. Our results showed that since the characteristics of DNA topoisomerase II make it avoid the defect of ‘long-branch attraction’ appearing in the previous phylogenetic analyses, our trees can not only reflect effectively the relationship of different major eukaryotic groups, which is widely accepted, but also reveal phylogenetic positions for these amitochondriate protozoa, which is different from the previous phylogenetic trees. They are not the earliest-branching eukaryotes, but diverged after some mitochondriate organisms such as kinetoplastids and mycetozoan; they are not a united group but occupy different phylogenetic positions. Combining with the recent cytological findings of mitochondria-like organelles in them, we think that though some of them (e.g. diplomonads, as represented by Giardia) may occupy a very low evolutionary position, generally these organisms are not as extremely primitive as was thought before; they should be polyphyletic groups diverging after the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondrion to adapt themselves to anaerobic parasitic life. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|