|
|||||
|
|
Enhanced COD and nitrogen removals for the treatment of swine wastewater by combining submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) and anaerobic upflow bed filter (AUBF) reactor |
|
| Authors: | Jeong-Hoon Shin Sang-Min Lee Jin-Young Jung Yun-Chul Chung Soo-Hong Noh |
| Affiliation: | aWater Environment and Remediation Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 39-1, Hawolgok-Dong, Sungbuk-Ku, Seoul, South Korea bDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University, 275 Budae-Dong, 330-717 Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea cDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, 234 Heungup, Wonju, Kangwon, South Korea |
| Abstract: | In order to enhance performances of organics removal and nitrification for the treatment of swine wastewater containing high concentration of organic solids and nitrogen than conventional biological nitrogen removal process, a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) was followed by an anaerobic upflow bed filter (AUBF) reactor in this research (AUBF–MBR process). The AUBF reactor is a hybrid reactor, which is the combination of an anoxic filter for denitrification and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) for acid fermentation. In the AUBF–MBR process, it showed a considerable enhancement of the effluent quality in terms of COD removal and nitrification. The submerged MBR could maintain more than 14,000 mg VSS/L of the biomass concentration. Total nitrogen (T-N) removal efficiency represented 60% when internal recycle ratio was three times of flow-rate (Q), although the nitrification occurred completely. Although the volatile fatty acids produced in AUBF reactor can enhance denitrification rate, but the AUBF–MBR process showed reduction of overall removal efficiency of the nitrogen due to the reduction of carbon source by methane production in the AUBF reactor compared to that of theoretical nitrogen removal efficiency. Long-term operation of the submerged MBR showed that the throughputs of the submerged MBR were respectively 74, 63, and 31 days at 10, 15, and 30 L/m2 h (LMH) of permeate flux. Resistance to filtration by rejected solid is the primary cause of fouling, however the priority of cake resistance (Rc) and fouling resistance (Rf) with respect to filtration phenomenon was different according to the amount of permeate flux. The submerged MBR, here, achieved a steady-state flux of 15 LMH at 0.4 atm. of trans-membrane pressure (TMP) but the flux can be enhanced in the future because shear force by tangential flow will be greater when multi-layer sheets of membrane were used. |
| Keywords: | Swine wastewater Membrane bioreactor Acidogenesis Denitrificaiton Throughput Permeate flux |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |