Selection and organisation of denitrifying electron-transfer pathways in Paracoccus denitrificans

(1) Under anaerobic conditions the respiratory chain in cells of Paracoccus denitrificans, from late exponential cultures grown anaerobically with nitrate as electron acceptor and succinate as carbon source, has been shown to reduce added nitrate via nitrite and nitrous oxide to nitrogen without any accumulation of these intermediates. (2) Addition of nitrous oxide to cells reducing nitrate strongly inhibited the latter reaction. The inhibition was reversed by preventing electron flow to nitrous oxide with either antimycin or acetylene. Electron flow to nitrous oxide thus resembles electron flow to oxygen in its inhibitory effect on nitrate reduction. In contrast, addition of nitrite to an anaerobic suspension of cells reducing nitrate resulted in a stimulation of nitrate reductase activity. Usually, addition of nitrite also partially overcame the inhibitory effect of nitrous oxide on nitrate reduction. The reason why added nitrous oxide, but not nitrite, inhibits nitrate reduction is suggested to be related to the higher reductase activity of the cells for nitrous oxide compared with nitrite. Explanations for the unexpected stimulation of nitrate reduction by nitrite in the presence or absence of added nitrous oxide are considered. (3) Nitrous oxide reductase was shown to be a periplasmic protein that competed with nitrite reductase for electrons from reduced cytochrome c. Added nitrous oxide strongly inhibited the reduction of added nitrite. (4) Nitrite reductase activity of cells was strongly inhibited by oxygen in the presence of physiological reductants, but nitrite reduction did occur in the presence of oxygen when isoascorbate plus N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine was the reductant. It is concluded that competition for available electrons by two oxidases, cytochrome aa₃ and cytochrome o, severely restricted electron flow to the nitrite reductase (cytochrome cd). For this reason it is unlikely that the oxidase activity of this cytochrome is ever functional in cells. (5) The mechanism by which electron flow to oxygen or nitrous oxide inhibits nitrate reduction in cells has been investigated. It is argued that relatively small changes in the extent of reduction of ubiquinone, or of another component of the respiratory chain with similar redox potential, critically determine the capacity for reducing nitrate. The argument is based on: (i) the response of an anthroyloxystearic acid fluorescent probe that is sensitive to changes in the oxidation state of ubiquinone; (ii) consideration of the total rates of electron flow through ubiquinone both in the presence of oxygen and in the presence of nitrate under anaerobic conditions; (iii) use of relative extents of oxidation of b-type cytochromes as an indicator of ubiquinone redox state, especially the finding that b-type cytochrome of the antimycin-sensitive part of the respiratory chain is more oxidised in the presence of added nitrous oxide, which inhibits nitrate reduction, than in the presence of added nitrite which does not inhibit. Arguments against b- or c-type cytochromes themselves controlling nitrate reduction are given. (6) In principle, control on nitrate reduction could be exerted either upon electron flow or upon the movement of nitrate to the active site of its reductase. The observations that inverted membrane vesicles and detergent-treated cells reduced nitrate and oxygen simultaneously at a range of total rates of electron flow are taken to support the latter mechanism. The failure of an additional reductant, durohydroquinone, to activate nitrate reduction under aerobic conditions in the presence of succinate is also evidence that it is not an inadequate supply of electrons that prevents the functioning of nitrate reductase under aerobic conditions. (7) In inverted membrane vesicles the division of electron flow between nitrate and oxygen is determined by a competition mechanism, in contrast to cells. This change in behaviour upon converting cells to vesicles cannot be attributed to loss of cytochrome c, and therefore of oxidase activity, from the vesicles because a similar change in behaviour was seen with vesicles prepared from cells of a cytochrome c-deficient mutant.