β‐Amino acids containing peptides and click‐cyclized peptide as β‐turn mimics: a comparative study with ‘conventional’ lactam‐ and disulfide‐bridged hexapeptides

The increasing interest in click chemistry and its use to stabilize turn structures led us to compare the propensity for β‐turn stabilization of different analogs designed as mimics of the β‐turn structure found in tendamistat. The β‐turn conformation of linear β‐amino acid‐containing peptides and triazole‐cyclized analogs were compared to ‘conventional’ lactam‐ and disulfide‐bridged hexapeptide analogs. Their 3D structures and their propensity to fold in β‐turns in solution, and for those not structured in solution in the presence of α‐amylase, were analyzed by NMR spectroscopy and by restrained molecular dynamics with energy minimization. The linear tetrapeptide Ac‐Ser‐Trp‐Arg‐Tyr‐NH₂ and both the amide bond‐cyclized, c[Pro‐Ser‐Trp‐Arg‐Tyr‐D ‐Ala] and the disulfide‐bridged, Ac‐c[Cys‐Ser‐Trp‐Arg‐Tyr‐Cys]‐NH₂ hexapeptides adopt dominantly in solution a β‐turn conformation closely related to the one observed in tendamistat. On the contrary, the β‐amino acid‐containing peptides such as Ac‐(R)‐β³‐hSer‐(S)‐Trp‐(S)‐β³‐hArg‐(S)‐β³‐hTyr‐NH₂, and the triazole cyclic peptide, c[Lys‐Ser‐Trp‐Arg‐Tyr‐βtA]‐NH₂, both specifically designed to mimic this β‐turn, do not adopt stable structures in solution and do not show any characteristics of β‐turn conformation. However, these unstructured peptides specifically interact in the active site of α‐amylase, as shown by TrNOESY and saturation transfer difference NMR experiments performed in the presence of the enzyme, and are displaced by acarbose, a specific α‐amylase inhibitor. Thus, in contrast to amide‐cyclized or disulfide‐bridged hexapeptides, β‐amino acid‐containing peptides and click‐cyclized peptides may not be regarded as β‐turn stabilizers, but can be considered as potential β‐turn inducers. Copyright © 2011 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.