A comparison of sap flux and water relations of leaves of various isolated trees with special reference to foundation movement in clay soil |
| |
Authors: | R K Misra R Sands |
| |
Institution: | (1) School of Forestry, The University of Melbourne, 3363 Creswick, Victoria, Australia;(2) Present address: Division of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, 4111 Brisbane, Queensland, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Diurnal variation in sap flux (S) through stems of six trees, two each of Ulmus procera SALISB., Melaleuca styphelioides SM. and Prunus cerasifera EHRH. ‘Nigra’ (referred to hereafter by their generic names), were estimated from measurements of heat pulse velocities.
Leaf water potential (ψ), stomatal conductance (g
s
) and transpiration from leaves (T) of all replicate trees were measured at 1300–1500h, once during the summer. On two separate occasions measurements were
made of S, ψ, (g
s
) and T for one each of Ulmus and Melaleuca trees to study diurnal variations in these parameters.
A 12×12 m2 area around each tree was kept covered to simulate the condition of trees growing on pavements adjacent to residential properties.
Sap flux for these tree species was in the order Melaleuca>Ulmus>Prunus. It is suggested that the smaller canopy and sapwood
area in Prunus compared to the other two species is responsible for lower water potential and lower transpiration rate than
the other species.
Detailed analysis of the diurnal variation in sap flux and water relation of leaves of Melaleuca and Ulmus indicated sap flux
of Melaleuca to be greater than that of Ulmus at the same transpiration rate per unit leaf area although the sapwood area
of the two species was marginally different. This may have been due either to the difference in canopy conductance or in leaf
area between the two species. With the assumption that sap flux closely resembles the rate of soil water extraction for both
species, results indicate that Melaleuca is likely to extract soil water at a higher rate than Ulmus and hence is capable
of causing greater shrinkage and soil movement than Ulmus. |
| |
Keywords: | clay soil English Elm foundation movement leaf water potential Melaleuca styphelioides Prickly Paperbark Prunus cerasifera Purple-leaved Cherry Plum sap flux soil water extraction stomatal conductance transpiration Ulmus procera vapour pressure deficit |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|