Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve |
| |
Authors: | Victor H. Hernandez Anna Gehrt Zhizi Jing Gerhard Hoch Marcus Jeschke Nicola Strenzke Tobias Moser |
| |
Affiliation: | 1InnerEarLab, Department of Otolaryngology, University Medical Center Goettingen;2Bernstein Focus for Neurotechnology, University of Goettingen;3Auditory Systems Physiology Group, Department of Otolaryngology, University Medical Center Goettingen;4Center for Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain, University of Goettingen;5Department of Chemical, Electronic, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Guanajuato |
| |
Abstract: | Direct electrical stimulation of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) by cochlear implants (CIs) enables open speech comprehension in the majority of implanted deaf subjects1-6. Nonetheless, sound coding with current CIs has poor frequency and intensity resolution due to broad current spread from each electrode contact activating a large number of SGNs along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea7-9. Optical stimulation is proposed as an alternative to electrical stimulation that promises spatially more confined activation of SGNs and, hence, higher frequency resolution of coding. In recent years, direct infrared illumination of the cochlea has been used to evoke responses in the auditory nerve10. Nevertheless it requires higher energies than electrical stimulation10,11 and uncertainty remains as to the underlying mechanism12. Here we describe a method based on optogenetics to stimulate SGNs with low intensity blue light, using transgenic mice with neuronal expression of channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2)13 or virus-mediated expression of the ChR2-variant CatCh14. We used micro-light emitting diodes (µLEDs) and fiber-coupled lasers to stimulate ChR2-expressing SGNs through a small artificial opening (cochleostomy) or the round window. We assayed the responses by scalp recordings of light-evoked potentials (optogenetic auditory brainstem response: oABR) or by microelectrode recordings from the auditory pathway and compared them with acoustic and electrical stimulation. |
| |
Keywords: | Neuroscience Issue 92 hearing cochlear implant optogenetics channelrhodopsin optical stimulation deafness |
|
|