首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi‐natural ecosystems
Authors:Marco Pautasso  Katrin Böhning‐Gaese  Philippe Clergeau  Victor R Cueto  Marco Dinetti  Esteban Fernández‐Juricic  Marja‐Liisa Kaisanlahti‐Jokimäki  Jukka Jokimäki  Michael L McKinney  Navjot S Sodhi  David Storch  Ludwik Tomialojc  Peter J Weisberg  John Woinarski  Richard A Fuller  Elena Cantarello
Institution:1. Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK;2. Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universit?t, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Siesmayerstr. 70, 60323 Frankfurt (Main), and Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK‐F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt (Main), Germany;3. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département d'Ecologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité, UMR 5173, 55 Rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France;4. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Piso 4, Pab 2, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina;5. Ecologia Urbana, Viale Petrarca, 103, 57124 Livorno, Italy;6. Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA;7. Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, PO Box 122, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland;8. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA;9. Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore;10. Center for Theoretical Study, Charles University, Jilská 1, 110 00 Praha 1, and Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vini?ná 7, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic;11. Museum of Natural History, University of Wroclaw, Sienkiewicza 21, 50‐335 Wroclaw, Poland;12. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89512‐0013, USA;13. Biodiversity Conservation Division, NT Department of Natural Resources Environment and the Arts, PO Box 496, Palmerston, Northern Territory 0831, Australia;14. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia;15. School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University Talbot Campus, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, UK
Abstract:Aim Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi‐natural ecosystems. Location World‐wide. Methods We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi‐natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term ‘urbanized’ instead of ‘urban’ ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species–area, species–abundance and species–biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non‐urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non‐urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world‐wide, broad‐scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity.
Keywords:Birds  conservation biogeography  environmental impacts  habitat heterogeneity  more‐individuals hypothesis  rarity  scale  species–  energy relationship  species–  people coexistence  urban ecology
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号