Effects of (artificial) boar stimuli on uterine activity in estrous sows |
| |
Authors: | Gerritsen R Langendijk P Soede N M Kemp B |
| |
Affiliation: | Adaptation Physiology, Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. rosemarijn.gerritsen@wur.nl |
| |
Abstract: | This study aims to examine influences of specific boar stimuli on uterine activity in estrous sows, by comparing uterine activity in presence of a mature teaser boar and a robot boar with variable stimuli. Nineteen multiparous, cyclic, commercial crossbred sows were used. Intra-luminal uterine pressure was measured using a non-surgical method for 45 min before applying one of four treatments in combination with a back-pressure-test (BPT): (1) robot with olfactory and auditory stimuli (R+O+A) (n=16), (2) robot with auditory stimuli (R+A) (n=16), (3) robot without additional stimuli (R) (n=16), (4) a mature boar (boar) (n=15). After treatment, measurements continued for 30 min. For each measurement, frequency, mean amplitude and mean duration of uterine contractions were determined. Spontaneous frequency of uterine contractions was 18.6+/-0.7 h(-1) on average and did not differ between treatments. Frequency of contractions increased significantly for the boar (+5.6+/-1.3 h(-1); P<0.01), R+O+A (+3.9+/-1.3; P<0.01) and R+A (+2.6+/-1.3; P<0.05). The effect of boar presence on frequency of contractions was greater than the effect of R (P<0.05). Amplitude and duration of contractions were not affected by treatment. The change in frequency was dependent on spontaneous frequency (P<0.01). In conclusion, the higher the level of boar stimuli, the greater the increase in frequency of uterine contractions. The results indicate that the used combinations of artificial boar stimuli do not mimic a 'whole' boar. It is unclear which boar stimuli stimulate maximal uterine activity during estrus. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|