17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity in endometrial cancer cells: Different metabolic pathways of estradiol in hormone-responsive and non-responsive intact cells |
| |
Authors: | Luigi A. M. Castagnetta Annalisa M. Montesanti Orazia M. Granata Giuseppa Oliveri Carmela M. G. Sorci Rosalba Amodio Maurizio Liquori Giuseppe Carruba |
| |
Affiliation: | 1 Hormone Biochemistry Laboratories, University Medical School, Palermo, Italy 2 Experimental Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Units, Palermo Branch of National Institute for Cancer Research (IST) of Genoa, c/o “M. Ascoli” Cancer Hospital Center, Palermo, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | In this paper we report that two human long-term endometrial cancer cell lines, Ishikawa and HEC-1A, exhibit quite different abilities in metabolizing estrogens. As a matter of fact, incubation of Ishikawa cells with close-to-physiological concentrations of estradiol (E2) as precursor resulted in: (1) elevated formation (up to 90%) of E2-sulphate (E2-S), using lower precursor concentrations; (2) very limited conversion to estrone (E1) (< 10% at 24 h incubation), as either free or sulphate; and (3) low but consistent production of other estrogen derivatives, such as 2-hydroxy-estrogens and estriol. Conversely, scant amounts (if any) of E2-S were found in HEC-1A cells, while no detectable formation of other estrogen metabolites could be observed after 24 h. On the other hand, E1 production was significantly greater (nearly 60% at 24 h) than in Ishikawa cells, a large proportion of E1 (over 50% of the total) being formed after only 6 h incubation using time-course experiments. The hypothesis that E2 metabolism could be minor in Ishikawa cells as a consequence of the high rate of E2-S formation encountered is contradicted by the evidence that conversion to E1 also remains limited in the presence of much lower E2-S amounts, seen using higher molar concentrations of precursor. Overall, we observe that 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17β-HSD) activity diverges significantly in intact Ishikawa and HEC-1A endometrial cancer cells. This difference could not merely be accounted for by the diverse amounts of substrate (E2) available to the cells, nor may it be imputed to different levels of endogenous estrogens. It should rather be sought in different mechanisms controlling 17β-HSD activity or, alternatively, in the presence of distinct isoenzymes in the two different cell types. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|