Using image and curve registration for measuring the goodness of fit of spatial and temporal predictions |
| |
Authors: | Reilly Cavan Price Phillip Gelman Andrew Sandgathe Scott A |
| |
Affiliation: | Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, USA. cavanr@biostat.umn.edu |
| |
Abstract: | Conventional measures of model fit for indexed data (e.g., time series or spatial data) summarize errors in y, for instance by integrating (or summing) the squared difference between predicted and measured values over a range of x. We propose an approach which recognizes that errors can occur in the x-direction as well. Instead of just measuring the difference between the predictions and observations at each site (or time), we first "deform" the predictions, stretching or compressing along the x-direction or directions, so as to improve the agreement between the observations and the deformed predictions. Error is then summarized by (a) the amount of deformation in x, and (b) the remaining difference in y between the data and the deformed predictions (i.e., the residual error in y after the deformation). A parameter, lambda, controls the tradeoff between (a) and (b), so that as lambda-->infinity no deformation is allowed, whereas for lambda=0 the deformation minimizes the errors in y. In some applications, the deformation itself is of interest because it characterizes the (temporal or spatial) structure of the errors. The optimal deformation can be computed by solving a system of nonlinear partial differential equations, or, for a unidimensional index, by using a dynamic programming algorithm. We illustrate the procedure with examples from nonlinear time series and fluid dynamics. |
| |
Keywords: | Calculus of variations Deformation Dynamic programming Errors-in-variables regression Goodness of fit Image registration Morphometrics Spatial distribution Time series Variance components |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|