In Planta Mutagenesis Determines the Functional Regions of the Wheat Puroindoline Proteins

In planta analysis of protein function in a crop plant could lead to improvements in understanding protein structure/function relationships as well as selective agronomic or end product quality improvements. The requirements for successful in planta analysis are a high mutation rate, an efficient screening method, and a trait with high heritability. Two ideal targets for functional analysis are the Puroindoline a and Puroindoline b (Pina and Pinb, respectively) genes, which together compose the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Ha locus that controls grain texture and many wheat end-use properties. Puroindolines (PINs) together impart soft texture, and mutations in either PIN result in hard seed texture. Studies of the PINs'' mode of action are limited by low allelic variation. To create new Pin alleles and identify critical function-determining regions, Pin point mutations were created in planta via EMS treatment of a soft wheat. Grain hardness of 46 unique PIN missense alleles was then measured using segregating F₂:F₃ populations. The impact of individual missense alleles upon PIN function, as measured by grain hardness, ranged from neutral (74%) to intermediate to function abolishing. The percentage of function-abolishing mutations among mutations occurring in both PINA and PINB was higher for PINB, indicating that PINB is more critical to overall Ha function. This is contrary to expectations in that PINB is not as well conserved as PINA. All function-abolishing mutations resulted from structure-disrupting mutations or from missense mutations occurring near the Tryptophan-rich region. This study demonstrates the feasibility of in planta functional analysis of wheat proteins and that the Tryptophan-rich region is the most important region of both PINA and PINB.NATURAL selection has captured a relatively small subset of potentially useful protein sequences. Unraveling the critical features of proteins via understanding the process of their evolution is a powerful approach for proteins present in many diverse species (Bashford et al. 1987; Hampsey et al. 1988). However, this approach is not feasible for the wheat puroindolines (PINs) that are present only in hexaploid wheat and related species (Massa and Morris 2006). The PINs are unique in structure in having a tryptophan-rich domain and are members of the protease inhibitor/seed storage/lipid transfer protein family (PF00234) (Finn et al. 2008).The tryptophan-rich domain has been hypothesized to control PIN function (Giroux and Morris 1997), but there is no unbiased direct evidence for this since previous studies have focused on the tryptophan box alone (Evrard et al. 2008). A nonbiased approach would consist of random mutagenesis followed by functional analysis (Bowie et al. 1990). This approach has been used extensively for proteins that can be expressed in vitro using either random (Tarun et al. 1998; Guo et al. 2004; Smith and Raines 2006; Georgelis et al. 2007) or site-directed mutations (Miyahara et al. 2008; Osmani et al. 2008). However, functional analysis of many plant proteins in vitro may not be comparable to in planta analysis. In the case of puroindolines, there is no in vitro assay that properly mimics the synergistic binding of PINA and PINB to starch granules or is as easy to measure as grain hardness. Therefore, creation and analysis of a large number of new alleles in wheat in planta is an ideal approach to dissect PIN function.The absence of high-throughput transformation and/or functional screening methods in most crop plants is the largest obstacle in the way of in planta protein functional analysis. However, high-throughput in vitro random or targeted mutagenesis followed by functional analysis has been demonstrated in Arabidopsis thaliana (Dunning et al. 2007) and Nicotiana benthamiana (Boter et al. 2007). Traditional in planta mutagenesis followed by analysis of loss-of-function mutations has been used to clone unknown genes (Xiong et al. 2001) or to define function for candidate genes (Haralampidis et al. 2001; Qi et al. 2006). A high-throughput in planta functional approach for PINA and PINB seems attractive for three reasons. First, the EMS mutation rate in wheat is higher than in any other plant (Slade et al. 2005; Feiz et al. 2009a). Second, PINs control the vast majority of variation in grain hardness (Campbell et al. 1999). Finally, a small-scale preliminary study indicated the feasibility of this approach (Feiz et al. 2009a).PINA and PINB are cysteine-rich proteins unique in having a tryptophan-rich domain (Blochet et al. 1993) and together compose the wheat Hardness (Ha) locus (Giroux and Morris 1998; Wanjugi et al. 2007a). Ha is located on chromosome 5DS and is the major determinant of wheat endosperm texture (Mattern et al. 1973; Law et al. 1978; Campbell et al. 1999). Soft texture (Ha) results when both Pin genes are wild type (Pina-D1a, Pinb-D1a) while hard texture (ha) results from mutations in either Pin (Giroux and Morris 1997, 1998). Transgenic studies in rice (Krishnamurthy and Giroux 2001), wheat (Beecher et al. 2002; Martin et al. 2006), and corn (Zhang et al. 2009) have demonstrated that Pin mutations are causative to hard grain texture. PINA and PINB are not functionally interchangeable and control grain hardness via cooperative binding to starch granules (Hogg et al. 2004; Swan et al. 2006; Wanjugi et al. 2007a; Feiz et al. 2009b). PIN binding to starch granules is mediated by polar lipids (Greenblatt et al. 1995) and PIN abundance is correlated with seed polar lipid content (Feiz et al. 2009b). Variation in PIN function affects grain hardness along with nearly all end product quality traits (Hogg et al. 2005; Martin et al. 2007, 2008; Wanjugi et al. 2007b; Feiz et al. 2008). Determining PINs'' function-determining regions could lead to greater knowledge of their mode of action and to wheat quality improvements. Current PIN functional analyses have been limited to in vitro tests of binding to each other (Ziemann et al. 2008) or to yeast membranes (Evrard et al. 2008).Here, we report the creation and functional analysis in planta of new alleles of PINA and PINB. This is the first successful in planta functional analysis of a crop plant protein.