A standardised approach to calculating floodplain tree condition to support environmental watering decisions

Ground-based visual assessment of crown condition is a cornerstone of tree condition assessment globally, and numerous condition assessment approaches have evolved to address the needs and perspectives of different users. In Australia’s iconic Murray–Darling Basin (MDB), stands of floodplain eucalypts are increasingly vulnerable to a range of interacting stressors related to climate change and over-extraction of water for consumptive and agricultural use. A standardised approach developed in 2008 for assessing floodplain trees within the MDB provides extensive guidance to ensure field data is collected consistently. However, there is minimal instruction on how to interpret data, and consequently a range of evaluation approaches have evolved. The lack of a standardised reporting framework generated by these different approaches makes it difficult for floodplain managers and environmental water holders to make repeatable, robust decisions for prioritising water allocations across competing locations. To provide improved lines of evidence to support decision making, this paper describes a ‘best-practise’ approach to calculating a tree condition score from field data. Within, we document existing approaches in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, and recommend a method that meets the needs of floodplain managers as a pragmatic reporting, communication and decision support tool that does not require statistical analysis. Case studies and a revised conceptual model of tree decline and recovery are provided to demonstrate the validity of the recommended approach.