Effect of luteal phase elevation in core temperature on forearm blood flow during exercise

Kolka, Margaret A., and Lou A. Stephenson. Effect ofluteal phase elevation in core temperature on forearm blood flow duringexercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 82(4):1079-1083, 1997.Forearm blood flow (FBF) as an index of skinblood flow in the forearm was measured in five healthy women by venousocclusion plethysmography during leg exercise at 80% peak aerobicpower and ambient temperature of 35°C (relative humidity 22%;dew-point temperature 10°C). Resting esophagealtemperature (T_es) was 0.3 ± 0.1°C higher in the midluteal than in the early follicular phase ofthe menstrual cycle (P < 0.05).Resting FBF was not different between menstrual cycle phases. TheT_es threshold for onset of skinvasodilation was higher (37.4 ± 0.2°C) in midluteal than inearly follicular phase (37.0 ± 0.1°C; P < 0.05). The slope of the FBF toT_es relationship was not different between menstrual cycle phases (14.0 ± 4.2 ml · 100 ml¹ · min¹ · °C¹for early follicular and 16.3 ± 3.2 ml · 100 ml¹ · min¹ · °C¹for midluteal phase). Plateau FBF was higher during exercise inmidluteal (14.6 ± 2.2 ml · 100 ml¹ · min¹ · °C¹)compared with early follicular phase (10.9 ± 2.4 ml · 100 ml¹ · min¹ · °C¹;P < 0.05). The attenuation of theincrease in FBF to T_es occurred when T_es was 0.6°C higher andat higher FBF in midluteal than in early follicular experiments(P < 0.05). In summary, the FBF response is different during exercise in the two menstrual cycle phasesstudied. After the attenuation of the increase in FBF and whileT_es was still increasing, thegreater FBF in the midluteal phase may have been due to the effects ofincreased endogenous reproductive endocrines on the cutaneousvasculature.