Old museum samples and recent taxonomy: A taxonomic,biogeographic and conservation perspective of the Niphargus tatrensis species complex (Crustacea: Amphipoda)

Natural history museum collections harbour valuable information on species. The usefulness of such data critically depends on the accurate identification of species, which has been challenged by introduction of molecular techniques into taxonomy. However, most collections may suffer from DNA degradation, due to age and/or improper preservation; hence the identification of specimens depends solely on morphological features. This study explores how and to what extent morphological data can help to solve ambiguous taxonomic cases based on selected species concepts and with the use of operational criteria in a species-hypothesis testing procedure. The studied taxon, the Niphargus tatrensis species complex, comprises freshwater subterranean amphipods, distributed across Central Europe, the taxonomic status of which was debated extensively between 1930 and 1960. Using the general species concept, character- and tree-based operational criteria reveal northern and southern diagnosable and exclusive lineages identified here as N. tatrensis Wrześniowski, 1888 and N. scopicauda sp. n., respectively. The remaining populations represent the non-exclusive N. aggtelekiensis Dudich, 1932, which occurs from the eastern Alps to Hungary. In the entire complex, altitudinal distribution is largely limited to areas above 400 m, where the mean annual temperature never exceeds 9°C. Seemingly well-defined distributional ranges of N. tatrensis and N. aggtelekiensis are fragmented in an ecological sense, which raises the question whether two of the three species recognised here actually consist of several unidentified taxa. Morphological similarity between the species, numerous polymorphic features, and the association with cool temperatures lead to a hypothesis in which fragmentation of the ancestral range occurred during post-Pleistocene climate warming, reducing gene flow across lowland populations due to niche conservatism of the ancestral species and/or to invasion of competitive species along the Danube and Drava rivers. The results are discussed regarding how old museum samples are conducive to more detailed molecular-taxonomic and conservation studies.