Seasonal changes in the response of winter wheat to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration grown in Open-Top Chambers and field tracking enclosures

Winter wheat was grown at ambient and elevated (ambient plus 350 μL L^–1) CO₂ concentrations in open top chambers and in field-tracking sun-lit climatized enclosures (elevated is 718 μL L^–1). There was no significant effect of CO₂ concentration on sheath, leaf and root biomass and leaf area in the early spring (January to April). 24-h canopy CO₂ exchange rate (CCER) was not significantly affected either. However, elevated CO₂ concentration increased CCER at midday, decreased evapotranspiration rate and increased instantaneous water-use-efficiency during early spring. Leaf, sheath and root nitrogen concentration per unit dry weight decreased and nonstructural carbohydrate concentration increased under elevated CO₂, and N-uptake per unit ground area decreased significantly (– 22%) towards the end of this period. These results contrast with results from the final harvest, when grain yield and biomass were increased by 19% under elevated CO₂. N concentration per dry weight was reduced by 5%, but N-uptake per unit ground area was significantly higher (+ 11%) for the elevated CO₂ treatment. 24-h and midday-CCER increased significantly more in late spring (period of 21 April to 30 May) (respectively by + 40% and 53%) than in the early spring (respectively 5% and 19%) in response to elevated CO₂. Midday evapotranspiration rate was reduced less by elevated CO₂ in the late spring (– 13%) than in early spring (– 21%). The CO₂ response of midday and 24-h CCER decreased again (+ 27% and + 23% resp.) towards the end of the growing season. We conclude that the low response to CO₂ concentration during the early spring was associated with a growth-restriction, caused by low temperature and irradiance levels. The reduction of nitrogen concentration, the increase of nonstructural carbohydrate, and the lower evapotranspiration indicated that CO₂ did have an effect towards the end of early spring, but not on biomass accumulation. Regression analysis showed that both irradiance and temperature affected the response to CO₂.