首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Evaluation of commercial kits for extraction of DNA and RNA from Clostridium difficile
Authors:Devon Metcalf  J. Scott Weese
Affiliation:1. Department of Thoracic Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China;2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China;1. Laboratory of Drug Addiction Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland;2. Department of Human Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland;3. Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland;4. Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland;1. Microbiology, Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal;2. Unité Antibiorésistance et Virulence Bactériennes, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Anses Laboratoire de Lyon, Lyon, France
Abstract:Commercial nucleic acid extraction kits are a cost effective, efficient and convenient way to isolate DNA and RNA from bacteria. Despite the increasing importance of the gastrointestinal pathogen, Clostridium difficile, and the increased use of nucleic acids in its identification, characterization, and investigation of virulence factors, no standardized or recommended methods for nucleic acid isolation exist. Here, we sought to evaluate 4 commercial DNA extraction kits and 3 commercial RNA extraction kits assessing cost, labor intensity, purity, quantity and quality of nucleic acid preparations. The DNA extraction kits produced a range of concentrations (20.9–546 ng/ml) and A260/280 ratios (1.92–2.11). All kits were suitable for DNA extraction with the exception of the Roche MagNA pure LC DNA isolation kit III which produced DNA of high yield but with substantial shearing, but that did not affect downstream PCR amplifications. For RNA extraction, the Qiagen RNeasy mini kit stood out producing preparations of consistently higher concentrations and higher RNA integrity numbers (RIN). The Roche MagNA pure LC RNA isolation kit produced preparations that could not be properly assigned RINs due to a failure to remove small RNAs which were interpreted as degradation. Good DNA and RNA yield are critical but methods are often overlooked. This study highlights the potential for critical variation between established commercial systems and the need for assessment of any extraction methods that are used.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号