Classical taxonomy and modern methodology |
| |
Authors: | Koste W. Shiel R. J. |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Ludwig-Brill-Strasse 5, D-4570 Quakenbrück, F.R.G.;(2) Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, P.O. Box 921, 2640 Albury, N. S. W., Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Classical rotifer taxonomy and recent approaches are reviewed. -taxonomy (morphology) remains the most widely-used technique, and most prone to subjective errors. Computer technology, and genetic or biochemical methods are not widely available in areas of most need — those with developing limnology programs. Strict adherence to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, uniform treatment of ecotypic variation and polymorphism, communication with and between systematists, and establishment of a centralized data base are among the points discussed. A standardized nomenclature is proposed. |
| |
Keywords: | Rotifera species definition taxonomy biogeography nomenclature ecotypes polymorphism |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|