The effect of micro-aerobic conditions on continuous ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Summary The effect of trace amounts of oxygen on the degree of ethanol inhibition in a continuous anaerobic culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was studied at the 100 gl ^–1 feed glucose concentration level. Results showed that the use of micro-aerobic conditions (0,5% of saturation) enhanced the utilisation of substrate by increasing the ethanol tolerance of the yeast without any significant decrease in the ethanol yield per unit substrate consumed. When the results were fitted to an equation of the form % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9% vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x% fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbyacaqG8o% GaaeypaiqabY7agaqcaiaab6cadaWcaaGcbaqcLbyacaqGdbWaaSba% aSqaaKqzagGaae4CaaWcbeaaaOqaaKqzagGaae4qamaaBaaaleaaju% gGbiaabohaaSqabaqcLbyacqGHRaWkcaqGlbWaaSbaaSqaaKqzagGa% ae4CaaWcbeaaaaqcLbyacaGGUaWaaSaaaOqaaKqzagGaae4samaaBa% aaleaajugGbiaabchaaSqabaaakeaajugGbiaabUeadaWgaaWcbaqc% LbyacaqGWbaaleqaaKqzagGaey4kaSIaaeywamaaBaaaleaajugGbi% aabchacaqGZbaaleqaaKqzagGaaiOlaiaacIcacaqGdbWaaSbaaSqa% aKqzagGaae4CaiaabAgaaSqabaqcLbyacqGHsislcaqGdbWaaSbaaS% qaaKqzagGaae4CaaWcbeaajugGbiaacMcaaaaaaa!6301!\{\text{\mu = \hat \mu }}{\text{.}}\frac{{{\text{C}}_{\text{s}} }}{{{\text{C}}_{\text{s}} + {\text{K}}_{\text{s}} }}.\frac{{{\text{K}}_{\text{p}} }}{{{\text{K}}_{\text{p}} + {\text{Y}}_{{\text{ps}}} .({\text{C}}_{{\text{sf}}} - {\text{C}}_{\text{s}} )}}\]it was found that the values for % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9% vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x% fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGabeiVdyaaja% aaaa!373F!\{\text{\hat \mu }}\], K_s and Y_ps were the same as for the non-aerobic case while the ethanol inhibition constant, K_p , had increased from 5,2 to 14,0 gl ^–1.Notation C_sf feed substrate concentration - gl ^–1 - C_s substrate concentration gl ^–1 - C_p product concentration - gl ^–1 - C_x cell concentration - gl ^–1 - D dilution rate - h^-1 - K_s substrate saturation constant - gl ^–1 - K_p product inhibition constant - gl ^–1 - m maintenance coefficient - h^–1 - Y_ps product yield coefficient - g EtOH/g glucose - Y_xs cell yield coefficient - g cells/g glucose - specific growth rate - h^–1 - % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9% vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x% fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGabeiVdyaaja% aaaa!373F!\{\text{\hat \mu }}\] maximum specific growth rate - h^–1