Dynamic adsorption behavior of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) depolymerase onto polyester surface investigated by QCM and AFM

Time-dependent adsorption behavior of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) depolymerase from Ralstonia pickettiiT1 on a polyester surface was studied by complementary techniques of quarts crystal microbalance (QCM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Amorphous poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) thin films were used as adsorption substrates. Effects of enzyme concentration on adsorption onto the PLLA surface were determined time-dependently by QCM. Adsorption of PHB depolymerase took place immediately after replacement of the buffer solutions with the enzyme solutions in the cell, followed by a gradual increase in the amount over 30 min. The amount of PHB depolymerase molecules adsorbed on the surface of amorphous PLLA thin films increased with an increase in the enzyme concentration. Time-dependent AFM observation of enzyme molecules was performed during the adsorption of PHB depolymerase. The phase response of the AFM signal revealed that the nature of the PLLA surface around the PHB depolymerase molecule was changed due to the adsorption function of the enzyme and that PHB depolymerase adsorbed onto the PLLA surface as a monolayer at a lower enzyme concentration. The number of PHB depolymerase molecules on the PLLA surface depended on the enzyme concentration and adsorption time. In addition, the height of the adsorbed enzyme was found to increase with time when the PLLA surface was crowded with the enzymes. In the case of higher enzyme concentrations, multilayered PHB depolymerases were observed on the PLLA thin film. These QCM and AFM results indicate that two-step adsorption of PHB depolymerase occurs on the amorphous PLLA thin film. First, adsorption of PHB depolymerase molecules takes place through the characteristic interaction between the binding domain of PHB depolymerase and the free surface of an amorphous PLLA thin film. As the adsorption proceeded, the surface region of the thin film was almost covered with the enzyme, which was accompanied by morphological changes. Second, the hydrophobic interactions among the enzymes in the adlayer and the solution become more dominant to stack as a second layer.