Tomato contains two differentially expressed genes encoding B-type phytochromes,neither of which can be considered an ortholog of Arabidopsis phytochrome B

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) contains two B-type phytochrome genes (PHYB1 and PHYB2). Fragments of these two PHYB were cloned following amplification by the polymerase chain reaction of a portion of their relatively well conserved 5 coding regions. Polypeptides encoded by these gene fragments exhibit 90% sequence identity. These two PHYB are independently expressed in organ-specific fashion. In mature plants, PHYB2 mRNA is most abundant in fruit and PHYB1 mRNA in expanded leaves. A phylogenetic analysis fails to establish which tomato PHYB is orthologous to either Arabidopsis PHYB or PHYD, the latter being a second B-type phytochrome. Instead, this analysis indicates that following the divergence of the Solanaceae and Brassicaceae from one another, a PHYB gene duplicated independently in each lineage. Consequently, Arabidopsis PHYB mutants cannot be considered strictly equivalent to the tomato tri mutants, which appear to be mutated at the PHYB1 locus. Similarly, other putative PHYB mutants might not be equivalent to those described for Arabidopsis and tomato. This situation complicates efforts to determine PHYB function because there might be no one answer to this question.Abbreviations PCR polymerase chain reaction - PHY undesignated phytochrome gene - PHYA, PHYB, etc phytochrome gene(s) of the A, B, etc. type This research was supported by USDA NRICGP grant 93-00939 and by NATO travel grant CRG 931183. It was initiated when two of us (L.H.P., M.-M.C.-P.) spent a sabbatical year at the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique in Versailles, France. L.H.P. gratefully acknowledges support provided by a senior guest fellowship from the Ministère de l'enseignement superieur et de la recherche during his stay in Versailles. L.H.P. and M.-M.C.-P thank all of their colleagues in Versailles for their warm hospitality and their willingness to share their expertise with us. We also thank Russell Malmberg, Richard Meagher and Robert Price for helpful discussions concerning the interpretation of molecular phylogenies.