首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


A multi-center randomised controlled trial of gatifloxacin versus azithromycin for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children and adults in Vietnam
Authors:Dolecek Christiane  Tran Thi Phi La  Nguyen Ngoc Rang  Le Thi Phuong  Ha Vinh  Phung Quoc Tuan  Doan Cong Du  Nguyen Thi Be Bay  Duong Thanh Long  Luong Bich Ha  Nguyen Trung Binh  Nguyen Thi Anh Hong  Pham Ngoc Dung  Mai Ngoc Lanh  Phan Van Be Bay  Vo Anh Ho  Nguyen Van Minh Hoang  Tran Thu Thi Nga  Tran Thuy Chau  Schultsz Constance  Dunstan Sarah J  Stepniewska Kasia  Campbell James Ian  To Song Diep  Basnyat Buddha  Nguyen Van Vinh Chau  Nguyen Van Sach  Nguyen Tran Chinh  Tran Tinh Hien  Farrar Jeremy
Institution:Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. cdolecek@oucru.org
Abstract:

Background

Drug resistant typhoid fever is a major clinical problem globally. Many of the first line antibiotics, including the older generation fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, are failing.

Objectives

We performed a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin (10 mg/kg/day) versus azithromycin (20 mg/kg/day) as a once daily oral dose for 7 days for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children and adults in Vietnam.

Methods

An open-label multi-centre randomised trial with pre-specified per protocol analysis and intention to treat analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was fever clearance time, the secondary outcome was overall treatment failure (clinical or microbiological failure, development of typhoid fever-related complications, relapse or faecal carriage of S. typhi).

Principal Findings

We enrolled 358 children and adults with suspected typhoid fever. There was no death in the study. 287 patients had blood culture confirmed typhoid fever, 145 patients received gatifloxacin and 142 patients received azithromycin. The median FCT was 106 hours in both treatment arms (95% Confidence Interval CI]; 94–118 hours for gatifloxacin versus 88–112 hours for azithromycin), (logrank test p?=?0.984, HR 95% CI]?=?1.0 0.80–1.26]).Overall treatment failure occurred in 13/145 (9%) patients in the gatifloxacin group and 13/140 (9.3%) patients in the azithromycin group, (logrank test p?=?0.854, HR 95% CI]?=?0.93 0.43–2.0]). 96% (254/263) of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid and 58% (153/263) were multidrug resistant.

Conclusions

Both antibiotics showed an excellent efficacy and safety profile. Both gatifloxacin and azithromycin can be recommended for the treatment of typhoid fever particularly in regions with high rates of multidrug and nalidixic acid resistance. The cost of a 7-day treatment course of gatifloxacin is approximately one third of the cost of azithromycin in Vietnam.

Trial Registration

Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN67946944
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号