Population biology of avena. VI. The role of genetic polymorphisms in the outcome of interspecific competition

Three different series of population samples of two Avena species cooccurring in California were grown for an analysis of the role of genetic variation in interspecies competition: I, samples from mixed fatua-barbata sites in nature, grown in mixed stands; II, samples from pure sites and grown in pure stands, and III, the same sites as in II but grown in mixed stands. Four macroenvironments and four densities were used giving a total of sixteen entries for each genetic/competitive unit in order to measure both mean and variance of survival and reproductive rates as fitness characters. Sites used in each series included low versus high levels of genetic polymorphism within each species. In general, high polymorphism favored A. fatua in competition with monomorphic A. barbata, and high polymorphism in A. barbata allowed it to compete better with monomorphic A. fatua observation fits well into the pattern of reduced polymorphism in natural mixed stands. Mean performance of polymorphic mixed stands was not consistently higher than the monomorphic combinations or pure stands but the greater relative stability over environments seemed to favor polymorphisms in one or both of the competitors. A relatively less regular pattern of density or competitive response in series III was interpreted as evidence for the lack of coadaptedness between samples drawn from pure sites. Several limitations characteristic of such controlled studies were briefly discussed; however, the tentative conclusions from laboratory studies provided several promising clues for more critical field studies.This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (GB 8627).