Using Multiscale Spatial Models to Assess Potential Surrogate Habitat for an Imperiled Reptile |
| |
Authors: | Jennifer M. Fill Jayme L. Waldron Shane M. Welch J. Whitfield Gibbons Stephen H. Bennett Timothy A. Mousseau |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina Columbia, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.; 2. Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, United States of America.; 3. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina, United States of America.; 4. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.; Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, ITALY, |
| |
Abstract: | In evaluating conservation and management options for species, practitioners might consider surrogate habitats at multiple scales when estimating available habitat or modeling species’ potential distributions based on suitable habitats, especially when native environments are rare. Species’ dependence on surrogates likely increases as optimal habitat is degraded and lost due to anthropogenic landscape change, and thus surrogate habitats may be vital for an imperiled species’ survival in highly modified landscapes. We used spatial habitat models to examine a potential surrogate habitat for an imperiled ambush predator (eastern diamondback rattlesnake, Crotalus adamanteus; EDB) at two scales. The EDB is an apex predator indigenous to imperiled longleaf pine ecosystems (Pinus palustris) of the southeastern United States. Loss of native open-canopy pine savannas and woodlands has been suggested as the principal cause of the species’ extensive decline. We examined EDB habitat selection in the Coastal Plain tidewater region to evaluate the role of marsh as a potential surrogate habitat and to further quantify the species’ habitat requirements at two scales: home range (HR) and within the home range (WHR). We studied EDBs using radiotelemetry and employed an information-theoretic approach and logistic regression to model habitat selection as use vs. availability. We failed to detect a positive association with marsh as a surrogate habitat at the HR scale; rather, EDBs exhibited significantly negative associations with all landscape patches except pine savanna. Within home range selection was characterized by a negative association with forest and a positive association with ground cover, which suggests that EDBs may use surrogate habitats of similar structure, including marsh, within their home ranges. While our HR analysis did not support tidal marsh as a surrogate habitat, marsh may still provide resources for EDBs at smaller scales. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|