Design and evaluation of thin and flexible theophylline imprinted polymer membrane materials |
| |
Authors: | Anna L. Hillberg Keith R. Brain Chris J. Allender |
| |
Affiliation: | Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, UK |
| |
Abstract: | The aim of this work was to produce a thin, flexible and diffusion able molecularly imprinted polymeric matrix with good template accessibility. Membranes were prepared using a non‐covalent molecular imprinting approach and their physical characteristics and binding capabilities investigated. Two materials were used, a poly(tri‐ethyleneglycol dimethyacrylate‐co‐methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid) copolymer containing 14% cross‐linker and a monomer (g) to porogen (ml) ratio of 1:0.5 (A), and a blend of poly(TEGMA‐co‐MAA) and polyurethane (B). The polyurethane was added to improve membrane flexiblity and stability. The polymers were characterized using AFM, SEM and nitrogen adsorption, whilst binding was evaluated using batch‐rebinding studies. For all membranes the specific surface area was low (<10 m2/g). MIP (A) films were shown to bind specifically at low concentrations but specific binding was masked by non‐specific interactions at elevated concentrations. Selectivity studies confirmed specificity at low concentrations. KD approximations confirmed a difference in the population of binding sites within NIP and MIP films. The data also indicated that at low concentrations the ligand‐occupied binding site population approached homogeneity. Scanning electron microscopy images of membrane (B) revealed a complex multi‐layered system, however these membranes did not demonstrate specificity for the template. The results described here demonstrate how the fundamental parameters of a non‐covalent molecularly imprinted system can be successfully modified in order to generate flexible and physically tolerant molecularly imprinted thin films. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
Keywords: | molecular imprinted polymer thin film theophylline |
|
|