Cover Picture: Proteomics 1/2009

In this issue of Proteomics you will find the following highlighted articles: How many tries before you get it right? British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli is reputed to have stated that “There are three types of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.” As those immersed in bioinformatics have recognized, though they may be slippery characters, statistics are the only way some information can be extracted from an experimental structure. One of the recurring problems is the question of how many samples need to be tested to get a reasonable, reliable result. This is particularly important when samples are difficult to get, require arduous preparation, or yield only small amounts. These experiments are generally multidimensional. In this article Cairns et al., examine the number of mass spectrometry samples that are required for a quantitative answer in a biomarker search. They evaluate MALDI‐TOF and SELDI‐TOF data for sources and amounts of variability on a pilot scale (biological and technical particularly) which allows them to calculate the number of samples required for a valid full‐scale screen. Cairns, D. A. et al., Proteomics 2009, 9, 74‐86. Double‐barreled proteomic run on embryonic stem cell membranes Embryonic stem cells (ESC) appear to be as close to the fountain of youth as most of us can reasonably expect to get in this lifetime. How close they come to being a “silver bullet” for cancer and other diseases is yet to be determined. Intoh et al., have taken a major step forward in improving our understanding of ESC control and maintenance. They applied 2‐D DIGE and trypsin digestion + iTRAQ labeling to identify membrane and membrane‐associated proteins in mouse ESCs that had or had not been exposed to leukemia inhibitory factor, a factor which maintains pluripotency in ESCs. Some 338 membrane and membrane‐associated proteins, up‐ or down‐regulated, were identified and assigned to functional groups. Intoh, A. et al., Proteomics 2009, 9, 126‐137. H, M, L You see these three letters on a variety of simple controllers: pump speed, temperature, under‐desk foot warmers, etc. Now you can hope to see them soon on bottles in a cell mass isotope labeling kit. Schwanhäusser et al., describe here a protocol for following levels of protein expression in array volumes and numbers with array simplicity. They pulse label samples with Heavy, Medium, or Light amino acids. Pulse‐labeling has been used for determining protein turnover rates for eons but with a quantitation problem for translation: did the ratio change because the numerator changed or because the denominator changed? The answer comes from labeling the untreated control with the M amino acid, then mixing M+H or M+L samples before fractionating by SDS‐PAGE and high‐resolution LC‐MS/MS. It worked for cell fractions (HeLa) as well as whole cells (yeast). Schwanhäusser, B. et al., Proteomics 2009, 9, 205‐209.