Pregnancy diagnosis in swine by palpation and by amplitude-depth ultrasound scanning

The relative accuracy of two pregnancy testing methods for swine were compared in a field study. The procedures used were manual palpation and amplitude-depth ultrasonic scanning. A total of 369 sows were examined by both methods. Seven additional gilts were examined by ultrasound only and 46 sows by palpation per rectum only. The number of correct positive and negative diagnoses made by both methods were calculated, and determination of accuracy as well as comparison between the tests were made on this basis. The relative accuracy was 97.6% for the manual method and 96.8% for the ultrasound method. Both tests had a high sensitivity, 99.2 and 98.9%, respectively. The ability of the tests to detect the non-pregnant animals was not as high, which is reflected by a lower specificity. No significant differences were noted between the two methods. A lower specificity and a lower negative predictive value were provided by ultrasound scanning as compared with those acquired by manual palpation. Both procedures were considered to be quick and convenient to perform. It was concluded that in spite of the new pregnancy testing methods introduced in the swine industry, manual palpation remains the most practical in terms of its accuracy, ease, and the minimal requirement for equipment. In gilts, palpation is unsuitable and ultrasonography currently remains the best choice for the diagnosis of pregnancy.