首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Evaluating a Large‐Scale Eelgrass Restoration Project in the Chesapeake Bay
Authors:Christopher Tanner  Sarah Hunter  Justin Reel  Thomas Parham  Mike Naylor  Lee Karrh  Kathryn Busch  Rebecca R Golden  Mark Lewandowski  Nancy Rybicki  Edward Schenk
Institution:1. St. Mary's College of Maryland, St. Mary's City, MD 20686, U.S.A.;2. RKK Engineers, 81 Mosher Street, Baltimore, MD 21217, U.S.A.;3. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 580 Taylor Avenue, Annapolis, MD 21401, U.S.A.;4. U.S. Geological Survey, 430 National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192, U.S.A.
Abstract:Approximately 90,000 shoots of eelgrass (Zostera marina) were planted over 3 years (2003–2005) at Piney Point (PP) in the lower Potomac River estuary in the Chesapeake Bay (mid‐Atlantic coast of North America) following 3 years of habitat evaluation using a Preliminary Transplant Suitability Index (PTSI) and test plantings. Initial survival was high for the 2003 and 2004 plantings; however, most of the eelgrass died during the summer following the fall planting. Habitat quality and restoration success were monitored for the 2005 plantings and compared to a nearby restoration site (St. George Island SGI]). Eelgrass planted at PP in the fall of 2005 declined through the summer of 2006 with some recovery in the spring of 2007, but was gone by the end of the summer of 2007. The summer decline from late July to mid‐August of 2006 coincided with water temperatures greater than 30°C, hypoxic oxygen (0–3 mg/L) concentrations, and low percent light at leaf level (PLL < 15%). Epiphyte loads were much heavier at PP than at SGI, despite similar water quality. We suggest that this was the result of higher wave exposure at PP. All of these factors are likely to have contributed to the mortality of the 2005 plantings. Submerged aquatic vegetation habitat quality based on the PTSI, median PLL during the growing season, and test plantings did not explain the decline of the plantings. Restoration site selection criteria should be expanded to include the effects of wave exposure on self‐shading and epiphyte loads, and the potential for both short‐term exposures to stressful conditions and long‐term changes in habitat quality.
Keywords:eelgrass  epiphytes  restoration  SAV habitat requirements  site selection  water quality                 Zostera marina   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号