Dedifferentiation derived cells exhibit phenotypic and functional characteristics of epidermal stem cells |
| |
Authors: | Cuiping Zhang Xiaobing Fu Peng Chen Xiaoxia Bao Fu Li Xiaoyan Sun Yonghong Lei Sa Cai Tongzhu Sun Zhiyong Sheng |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Wound Healing and Cell Biology Laboratory, Burns Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, General Hospital of PLA, Trauma Center of Postgraduate Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China;2. Co‐first authors;3. Electromagnetics and Laser Biology Laboratory, Radiation Medicine Institute, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China |
| |
Abstract: | Differentiated epidermal cells can dedifferentiate into stem cells or stem cell‐like cells in vivo. In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of dedifferentiation‐derived cells. Epidermal sheets eliminated of basal stem cells were transplanted onto the skin wounds in 47 nude athymic (BALB/c‐nu/nu) mice. After 5 days, cells negative for CK10 but positive for CK19 and β1‐integrin emerged at the wound‐neighbouring side of the epidermal sheets. Furthermore, the percentages of CK19 and β1‐integrin+ cells detected by flow cytometric analysis were increased after grafting (P < 0.01) and CK10+ cells in grafted sheets decreased (P < 0.01). Then we isolated these cells on the basis of rapid adhesion to type IV collagen and found that there were 4.56% adhering cells (dedifferentiation‐derived cells) in the grafting group within 10 min. The in vitro phenotypic assays showed that the expressions of CK19, β1‐integrin, Oct4 and Nanog in dedifferentiation‐derived cells were remarkably higher than those in the control group (differentiated epidermal cells) (P < 0.01). In addition, the results of the functional investigation of dedifferentiation‐derived cells demonstrated: (1) the numbers of colonies consisting of 5–10 cells and greater than 10 cells were increased 5.9‐fold and 6.7‐fold, respectively, as compared with that in the control (P < 0.01); (2) more cells were in S phase and G2/M phase of the cell cycle (proliferation index values were 21.02% in control group, 45.08% in group of dedifferentiation); (3) the total days of culture (28 days versus 130 days), the passage number of cells (3 passages versus 20 passages) and assumptive total cell output (1 × 105 cells versus 1 × 1012 cells) were all significantly increased and (4) dedifferentiation‐derived cells, as well as epidermal stem cells, were capable of regenerating a skin equivalent, but differentiated epidermal cells could not. These results suggested that the characteristics of dedifferentiation‐derived cells cultured in vitro were similar to epidermal stem cells. This study may also offer a new approach to yield epidermal stem cells for wound repair and regeneration. |
| |
Keywords: | epidermal cells epidermal stem cells dedifferentiation isolation characterization |
|
|