首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Sharing primary percutaneous coronary intervention care: first experiences with South Limburg ST-elevation myocardial infarction network
Authors:A Lux  J Vainer  R A L J Theunissen  L F Veenstra  I Kasperski  B C G Gho  M Stein  M Ilhan  A W Ruiters  P J C Winkler  A van Beurden  W Dohmen  S Rasoul  A W J van &#x;t Hof  South Limburg Interventional Cardiology Group  the Netherlands
Institution:1.Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands ;2.Heart+Vascular Center, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands ;3.Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands ;4.Department of Medical Management, Municipal Health Services South Limburg, Heerlen, The Netherlands
Abstract:BackgroundIn the region of South Limburg, the Netherlands, a shared ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) networking system (SLIM network) was implemented. During out-of-office hours, two percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres—Maastricht University Medical Centre and Zuyderland Medical Centre—are supported by the same interventional cardiologist. The aim of this study was to analyse performance indicators within this network and to compare them with contemporary European Society of Cardiology guidelines.MethodsKey time indicators for an all-comer STEMI population were registered by the emergency medical service and the PCI centres. The time measurements showed a non-Gaussian distribution; they are presented as median with 25th and 75th percentiles.ResultsBetween 1 February 2018 and 31 March 2019, a total of 570 STEMI patients were admitted to the participating centres. The total system delay (from emergency call to needle time) was 65 min (53–77), with a prehospital system delay of 40 min (34–47) and a door-to-needle time of 22 min (15–34). Compared with in-office hours, out-of-office hours significantly lengthened system delays (55 (47–66) vs 70 min (62–81), p < 0.001), emergency medical service transport times (29 (24–34) vs 35 min (29–40), p < 0.001) and door-to-needle times (17 (14–26) vs 26 min (18–37), p < 0.001).ConclusionsWith its effective patient pathway management, the SLIM network was able to meet the quality criteria set by contemporary European revascularisation guidelines.
Keywords:Primary PCI network  Regional care  Quality indicator
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号