Soil solarisation, amendments and bio-control agents for the control of Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cumini in aridisols

The effects of soil solarisation, residue incorporation, summer irrigation and biocontrol agents singly or in combination on survival of Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cumini were ascertained in the 2000 and 2001 summer seasons. In amended plots, temperature increased by 2.5°C over non‐amended plots (42–51°C) at various soil depths. Combining amendments and soil solarisation elevated the soil temperatures by 0.5–5°C and 2.5–13.0°C compared to non‐amended solarised and non‐solarised plots, respectively. These treatment combinations significantly reduced M. phaseolina and Fusarium propagules compared to control. Of these, combining mustard pod residues with soil solarisation almost eliminated viable propagules of both the pathogens at 0–30 cm soil depth. However, a combination of mustard pod residue and oil‐cake (2.5 + 0.5 ton ha^?1) with only one summer irrigation also caused pronounced reduction in pathogenic propagules, which was equal to that recorded in non‐amended solarised plots. The effect of surviving propagules of M. phaseolina and Fusarium on incidence of dry root rot on clusterbean and wilt on cumin was studied in subsequent rainy and winter seasons, respectively. Significant reductions in both diseases were recorded in residue and biocontrol amended plots with or without polyethylene mulching compared to non‐amended control. The lowest plant mortality in both the crops was recorded in mustard residue amended solarised plots in a two year field experiment. However, the disease indices in the plots having a combination of mustard residues and oil‐cake amendment with one summer irrigation was equal to that achieved in the treatment having polyethylene mulching. These results suggest that in hot arid regions use of Brassica residues can be a practical and feasible substitute for polyethylene mulching in managing soil‐borne diseases.