Why cattle feed much and humans think much - New approach to confirm the expensive tissue hypothesis by molecular data

The “expensive tissue hypothesis” states that large brains are active at high metabolic rates, which have to be financed by a significant trade-off with other organs such as the alimentary tract. Recent morphological findings on primate brains and guts support this idea also considering the importance of high-energy diets as a possible driving power of this process. However, the trade-off correlation between brain and alimentary tract, the essence of the “expensive tissue hypothesis”, has not yet been tested using molecular data to complement morpho-functional findings. We therefore hypothesize that the activity of marker proteins expressed both in brain and alimentary tract should parallel functional morphology in organs at the molecular level. Thus, in animals feeding on hard to digest diet, we would expect a high concentration per unit mass of that marker protein in the digestive tract and reversely a lower concentration in the brain. In contrast, in animals feeding on easily-digested, high-energy food we would expect the reverse pattern. Recent preliminary studies suggest that carbonic anhydrase II (CA-II) could act as a marker. The enzyme concentration was found to increase in the brain with higher cerebral activity from cattle to humans and to reversely decrease in salivary secretions. The reverse concentration of CA-II in saliva and brains of cattle and primates might be the first molecular evidence of the validity of the “expensive tissue hypothesis”.