Three Different Methods for Measuring Xylem Cavitation and Embolism: A Comparison

Three different methods for measuring xylem embolism due towater cavitation were compared—the acoustic method, thehydraulic method and the anatomical method. Young plants ofCeratonia siliqua L. were water stressed for 9, 16 and 23 d. Xylem cavitation was detected by counting ultrasound (100–300kHz) acoustic emissions (AE) from 1-year-old twigs (acousticmethod). Xylem embolism was detected by measuring the loss ofhydraulic conductivity of twigs of the same age (hydraulic method).The blockage of single xylem conduits was detected by perfusingSafranin into the xylem of 1-year-old twigs of stressed plantsand measuring the number and the diameters of non-conductingxylem conduits, under the microscope (anatomical method). It was noted that: (a) the number of AE and the loss of conductivityincreased with the water stress applied; (b) a linear relationseemed to exist between the number of AE and the loss of conductivity,suggesting that the AE counted could be only (or mainly) producedin the xylem conduits; (c) the vulnerability of the xylem conduitsto embolism was a direct function of their diameter; and (d)the measured loss of conductivity was of the same order of magnitudeas the theoretical one. The three methods gave fairly similar results. Nonetheless,they are not alternative to one another in that: (a) the acousticmethod allows continuous recordings to be made but does notprovide information about the actual damage suffered by plants;(b) the hydraulic method is very informative but destructive;and (c) the anatomical method is very useful both in phytogeographicaland in genetic improvement studies. Ceratonia siliqua L, Carob tree, water stress, xylem embolism, acoustic method, hydraulic method, anatomical method