首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

利用数字图像估测棉花叶面积指数
引用本文:王方永,王克如,李少昆,肖春华,王琼,陈江鲁,金秀良,吕银亮.利用数字图像估测棉花叶面积指数[J].生态学报,2011,31(11):3090-3100.
作者姓名:王方永  王克如  李少昆  肖春华  王琼  陈江鲁  金秀良  吕银亮
作者单位:1. 新疆兵团绿洲生态农业重点开放实验室/新疆作物高产研究中心,新疆石河子,832003
2. 新疆兵团绿洲生态农业重点开放实验室/新疆作物高产研究中心,新疆石河子,832003;中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农业部作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室,北京,100081
基金项目:国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划),国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)
摘    要:叶面积指数是指示棉花长势、产量形成和高产群体调控等信息的重要结构特征参数。本研究的目的在于利用基于冠层图像光照叶片和光照土壤分量的图像透光率估测棉花叶面积指数。通过3年不同种植密度、品种、施氮量和灌水量的田间试验,在棉花不同的生育期用数码相机、LAI-2000冠层仪和线性光量子传感器采集数据并进行破坏性取样测定,分析图像透光率的有效性和建立LAI估测模型,进而对图像方法、LAI-2000和破坏性取样方法进行比较和分析。结果表明:(1)在太阳高度角最大且变化最小的正午时段,数码相机测量的图像透光率与线性光量子传感器测量的冠层透光率较一致且相对稳定。(2)图像透光率能反映除吐絮期以外各时期的冠层透光状况,但是当LAI大于5时图像透光率出现饱和。(3)综合分析2009和2010年数据,建立了图像透光率估测LAI的模型(R2=0.8438, SE=0.5605);利用2007年独立试验资料检验估测模型的性能,模型检验的拟合度较高(R2=0.8767)且预测误差较小(RMSE=0.4305),当LAI>5时模型的预测能力降低。(4)数字图像、LAI-2000和破坏性取样三种方法测量的LAI值之间均呈现显著的线性相关(R2>0.85),但是图像透光率的饱和性致使当LAI>5时明显低估叶面积指数。

关 键 词:棉花  叶面积指数  数字图像  透光率  LAI-2000
收稿时间:9/16/2010 5:16:02 AM
修稿时间:2011/3/28 0:00:00

Estimation of leaf area index of cotton using digital Imaging
WANG Fangyong,WANG Keru,LI Shaokun,XIAO Chunhu,WANG Qiong,CHEN Jianglu,JIN Xiuliang and LV Yinliang.Estimation of leaf area index of cotton using digital Imaging[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(11):3090-3100.
Authors:WANG Fangyong  WANG Keru  LI Shaokun  XIAO Chunhu  WANG Qiong  CHEN Jianglu  JIN Xiuliang and LV Yinliang
Institution:Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Agriculture of Xinjiang Construction Crops
Abstract:Leaf area index (LAI) is one of the most important structural characteristics for understanding cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth, yield, and population structure. Destructive measurements are tedious, time consuming, and labor intensive. Modern techniques such as remote sensing and measurements from ground-based optical instruments are non-destructive and effective methods to rapidly measure LAI. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of using images from a common digital camera to measure LAI of cotton. We compared the results obtained using a digital camera with those obtained using a destructive sampling method and an LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer. Three field experiments were conducted with different planting densities, cultivars, nitrogen rates, and irrigation rates. A digital camera, an LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer, and an LI-191SA linear quantum sensor were used to observe the cotton canopy and record data. Leaves were also sampled destructively at their main growth stages. The digital camera images were captured looking downwards onto the canopy, and then an algorithm was used to separate the components of each image into four classes; sunlit leaves (SL), sunlit soil (SS), shaded leaves (ShL), and shaded soil (ShS). The parameter of image transmittance (Timag) was calculated from SL and SS based on the Beer-Lambert Law. The validity of Timag was analyzed and a quantitative model of Timag and LAI was developed. The three methods for determining LAI (digital imaging, LAI-2000, and destructive sampling) were compared. Analysis of the diurnal pattern of transmittance of the cotton canopy showed that the best time for measuring Timag was around solar noon, because at this time the solar elevation angle is high and remains relatively constant during measurements. Around solar noon, Timag was in good agreement with Tquan (transmittance measured with a linear quantum sensor). By analyzing the relationships among Timag, Tquan,and diffuse non-interceptance (DIFN), we determined that Timag could be used to estimate light attenuation in the cotton canopy at different stages, except for the boll opening stage. In addition, Timag was saturated at LAI >5. We analyzed the relationship between LAIdest (LAI measured destructively) and Timag using data from 2009 and 2010. The R2 and SE of the calibration model were 0.8438 and 0.5605, respectively. The ability of Timag to predict LAI was validated using an independent dataset (2007 data). The determination coefficient and RMSE of the validation model were 0.8767 and 0.4305, respectively. However, the model underestimated LAI as the LAI exceeded 5. The Timag saturation, which was largely because of errors in image recognition and segmentation, resulted in underestimation of LAI. Intercomparisons of LAI estimates showed that there were small discrepancies and significant correlations among data obtained from digital images, the LAI-2000, and destructive sampling methods. Data from the LAI-2000 was highly consistent with that obtained by destructive sampling. Our results indicate that Timag data is not as robust as that obtained using other techniques, in that it does not reliably detect non-green leaves, and it is affected by radiation conditions. Nonetheless, it is a simple, reliable, and reproducible approach for general estimates of LAI. The digital camera could be mounted on a tractor or farm vehicle for real-time, non-destructive monitoring of LAI to support field management.
Keywords:cotton  LAI  digital image  transmittance  LAI-2000
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号