首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Modelling the distribution and compositional variation of plant communities at the continental scale
Authors:Borja Jiménez‐Alfaro  Susana Suárez‐Seoane  Milan Chytrý  Stephan M. Hennekens  Wolfgang Willner  Michal Hájek  Emiliano Agrillo  Jose M. Álvarez‐Martínez  Ariel Bergamini  Henry Brisse  Jörg Brunet  Laura Casella  Daniel Dítě  Xavier Font  François Gillet  Petra Hájková  Florian Jansen  Ute Jandt  Zygmunt Kącki  Jonathan Lenoir  John S. Rodwell  Joop H. J. Schaminée  Lucia Sekulová  Jozef Šibík  Željko Škvorc  Ioannis Tsiripidis
Affiliation:1. Research Unit of Biodiversity (CSIC, UO, PA), Oviedo University, Mieres, Asturias, Spain;2. Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management, University of León, León, Spain;3. Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic;4. Alterra, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands;5. Vienna Institute for Nature Conservation and Analyses, Vienna, Austria;6. Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria;7. Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy;8. Environmental Hydraulics Institute IH, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Cantabria, Santander, Spain;9. Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland;10. Aix‐Marseille Université, Marignane, France;11. Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden;12. ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Roma, Italy;13. Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Bratislava, Slovakia;14. Department of Plant Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;15. UMR Chrono‐environnement, CNRS – Université Bourgogne Franche‐Comté, Besan?on Cedex, France;16. Laboratory of Paleoecology, Department of Vegetation Ecology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic;17. Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany;18. Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany;19. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig, Germany;20. Botanical Garden, University of Wroclaw, Wroc?aw, Poland;21. UR “Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés” (EDYSAN UMR 7058, CNRS‐UPJV), Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France;22. University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK;23. Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia;24. Department of Botany, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract:

Aim

We investigate whether (1) environmental predictors allow to delineate the distribution of discrete community types at the continental scale and (2) how data completeness influences model generalization in relation to the compositional variation of the modelled entities.

Location

Europe.

Methods

We used comprehensive datasets of two community types of conservation concern in Europe: acidophilous beech forests and base‐rich fens. We computed community distribution models (CDMs) calibrated with environmental predictors to predict the occurrence of both community types, evaluating geographical transferability, interpolation and extrapolation under different scenarios of sampling bias. We used generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM) to assess the role of geographical and environmental drivers in compositional variation within the predicted distributions.

Results

For the two community types, CDMs computed for the whole study area provided good performance when evaluated by random cross‐validation and external validation. Geographical transferability provided lower but relatively good performance, while model extrapolation performed poorly when compared with interpolation. Generalized dissimilarity modelling showed a predominant effect of geographical distance on compositional variation, complemented with the environmental predictors that also influenced habitat suitability.

Main conclusions

Correlative approaches typically used for modelling the distribution of individual species are also useful for delineating the potential area of occupancy of community types at the continental scale, when using consistent definitions of the modelled entity and high data completeness. The combination of CDMs with GDM further improves the understanding of diversity patterns of plant communities, providing spatially explicit information for mapping vegetation diversity and related habitat types at large scales.
Keywords:community distribution models  ecosystem properties  extent of occurrence  generalized dissimilarity modelling  habitat conservation  plant communities  vegetation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号