Linking habitat specialization with species' traits in European birds |
| |
Authors: | Jiří Reif David Hořák Anton Krištín Lenka Kopsová Vincent Devictor |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Inst. for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles Univ. in Prague, Czech Republic;2. Dept of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Faculty of Science, Palacky Univ. in Olomouc, Czech Republic;3. Dept of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles Univ. in Prague, Czech Republic;4. Inst. of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Zvolen, Slovakia;5. UMR 5554 CNRS‐UM, Inst. des Sciences de l'Evolution, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier cedex 05, France |
| |
Abstract: | Ecological specialization provides information about adaptations of species to their environment. However, identification of traits representing the relevant dimensions of ecological space remains challenging. Here we endeavoured to explain how complex habitat specializations relate to various ecological traits of European birds. We employed phylogenetic generalized least squares and information theoretic approach statistically controlling for differences in geographic range size among species. Habitat specialists had narrower diet niche, wider climatic niche, higher wing length/tail length ratio and migrated on shorter distances than habitat generalists. Our results support an expected positive link between habitat and diet niche breadth estimates, however a negative relationship between habitat and climate niche breadths is surprising. It implies that habitat specialists occur mostly in spatially restricted environments with high climatic variability such as mountain areas. This, however, complicates our understanding of predicted impacts of climatic changes on avian geographical distributions. Our results further corroborate that habitat specialization reflects occupation of morphological space, when specialists depend more on manoeuvrability of the flight and are thus more closely associated to open habitats than habitat generalists. Finally, our results indicate that long distance movements might hamper narrow habitat preferences. In conclusion, we have shown that species’ distributions across habitats are informative about their positions along other axes of ecological space and can explain states of particular functional traits, however, our results also reveal that the links between different niche estimates cannot be always straightforwardly predicted. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|