Factors affecting the bacteria-heterotrophic nanoflagellate relationship in oligo-mesotrophic lakes

The coupling between bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates(HNF) was examined in nine lakes of low productivity for evidenceof the effects of various metazooplankton (i.e. rotifers, cladoceransand copepods) on this relationship. We considered the size ofcladocerans and, in contrast to most previous across-systemstudies, the three strata of the water column (i.e. epilimnion,metalimnion and hypolimnion). Rotifers were numerically dominantin all lakes and accounted for 45–84% of total metazooplanktonabundance, while the abundance of large cladocerans was relativelylow, ranging from 0.066 to 15.2 ind. L^–1. The across-lakerelationship between bacteria and HNF was significant in thedeeper strata (meta- and hypolimnion) but not in the epilimnionand in the two groups of lakes separated on the basis of theiraverage number of large cladocerans (<5 and >5 ind. L^–1,respectively). The results confirmed the negative impacts oflarge cladocerans on HNF, but also showed that rotifers, probablythrough grazing on HNF, may be an important factor causing variationin the bacteria–HNF relationship in unproductive waters.Quadratic models best described the relationships between metazooplanktonand the ratio of bacteria to HNF. This ratio seemed to be aresult of complex interactions between several factors, includingthe zooplankton composition and abundance and the depth of thelake. Indeed, this ratio significantly decreased across lakes,with increase in depth. In addition, shallower lakes (having<5 large cladocerans L^–1 and fewer Polyarthra vulgaris)tended to have more bacteria and HNF and a higher ratio of bacteriato HNF than deeper lakes (which had >5 large cladoceransL^–1 and substantial proportions of P. vulgaris). We suggestthat the epilimnion, metalimnion and hypolimnion of lakes betaken into account when analysing the bacteria–HNF relationshipas well as the cascading effects of zooplankton on microbialcommunities.