Structural Basis for T Cell Alloreactivity among Three HLA-B14 and HLA-B27 Antigens

The existence of cytotoxic T cells (CTL) cross-reacting with the human major histocompatibility antigens HLA-B14 and HLA-B27 suggests that their alloreactivity could be due to presentation of shared peptides in similar binding modes by these molecules. We therefore determined the crystal structures of the subtypes HLA-B*1402, HLA-B*2705, and HLA-B*2709 in complex with a proven self-ligand, pCatA (peptide with the sequence IRAAPPPLF derived from cathepsin A (residues 2–10)), and of HLA-B*1402 in complex with a viral peptide, pLMP2 (RRRWRRLTV, derived from latent membrane protein 2 (residues 236–244) of Epstein-Barr virus). Despite the exchange of 18 residues within the binding grooves of HLA-B*1402 and HLA-B*2705 or HLA-B*2709, the pCatA peptide is presented in nearly identical conformations. However, pLMP2 is displayed by HLA-B*1402 in a conformation distinct from those previously found in the two HLA-B27 subtypes. In addition, the complexes of HLA-B*1402 with the two peptides reveal a nonstandard, tetragonal mode of the peptide N terminus anchoring in the binding groove because of the exchange of the common Tyr-171 by His-171 of the HLA-B*1402 heavy chain. This exchange appears also responsible for reduced stability of HLA-B14-peptide complexes in vivo and slow assembly in vitro. The studies with the pCatA peptide uncover that CTL cross-reactive between HLA-B14 and HLA-B27 might primarily recognize the common structural features of the bound peptide, thus neglecting amino acid replacements within the rim of the binding grooves. In contrast, structural alterations between the three complexes with the pLMP2 peptide indicate how heavy chain polymorphisms can influence peptide display and prevent CTL cross-reactivity between HLA-B14 and HLA-B27 antigens.T cells possessing the ability to recognize major histocompatibility complex (MHC)² molecules from another individual of the same species, also termed alloreactive T cells, may constitute up to 10% of the T cell pool of an individual, and their precursor frequency can be 100–1,000-fold higher than that of self-restricted T cells directed against a foreign peptide (1, 2). The ability of alloreactive T cells to cross-react with nonself-MHC molecules is a major obstacle preventing successful organ transplantations (3–5). Two mechanisms, direct or indirect allorecognition, can be responsible for the rejection of a transplant by alloreactive T cells (6). In the first case, donor cells expressing MHC molecules are directly recognized by host T cells (7), whereas indirect allorecognition involves the presentation of peptides derived from donor proteins by MHC molecules of the host, followed by the detection of the complexes by the host T cells (8). However, although alloreactive T cells are very common and of great clinical importance, neither the primary basis for their existence nor the reasons underlying their cross-reactivity are sufficiently understood to draw general conclusions (9–11). Only very few studies have addressed the structural basis for the recognition of distinct MHC antigens by cross-reactive T cells (12–18). One of the most important questions regards the individual contribution of the bound peptide and binding groove residues of the heavy chain (HC) of MHC class I antigens to the interaction with T cell receptors (TCR).Here we analyze an HLA-B14 subtype, HLA-B*1402 (named B*1402), as well as two HLA-B27 subtypes, HLA-B*2705 and HLA-B*2709 (named B*2705 and B*2709), to shed light on the structural basis of peptide presentation and T cell alloreactivity among these HLA-B molecules. The amino acid sequences of B*1402 and B*2705 HC differ from each other at 18 positions, all of which are part of the peptide-binding groove (Fig. 1). These amino acid exchanges result in different repertoires of bound peptides; B*1402 and B*2705 share only about 4% of their peptides (19), whereas this value rises to 88% for the B*2705 and B*2709 subtypes (20), which are distinguished only by a single residue at the floor of the binding groove (B*2705, Asp-116; B*2709, His-116). The structural similarities between the two HLA-B27 subtypes (21–27) permit extensive cross-reactivity (up to 90%) of cytotoxic T cells (CTL) (28), whereas CTL alloreactivity between B*1402 and B*2705 is drastically reduced (to about 3%) (19), in line with the very limited overlap of their peptide repertoires.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Amino acid sequence differences among B*1402 and B*2705 HC. The 18 residues distinguishing the two subtypes are all located in or in the immediate vicinity of the peptide-binding groove. B*2705 differs from B*2709 only by a D116H exchange (not shown). The residues are indicated by spheres with volumes roughly proportional to the volumes of the respective amino acid side chain in solution (77). The spheres are colored according to the biochemical properties of the respective amino acids, as indicated at the bottom of the image.The HLA-B14 and HLA-B27 subtypes are distinguished from most other HLA class I molecules in their requirement for an arginine at anchor position 2 of the bound peptide (p2) (20, 29, 30). This preference is nearly absolute in B*2705 and B*2709 (31), whereas B*1402 tolerates also glutamine, glutamate, and proline as p2 anchors (19, 29). Statistically significant differences between B*1402 and B*2705 are also found at several other peptide positions (19). Previous structural and cellular studies of the HLA-B27 subtypes have suggested that molecular mimicry between the viral peptide pLMP2 (RRRWRRLTV, derived from Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2, residues 236–244) and the self-peptide pVIPR (RRKWRRWHL, derived from vasoactive intestinal peptide type 1 receptor, residues 400–408), when bound to B*2705, serves as an example of how a cellular immune response could be triggered that might contribute to the onset of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) through an autoimmune mechanism (22, 24). CTL that recognize the B*2705 and the B*2709 subtypes in complex with the self-peptide pVIPR (22) exemplify alloreactivity in this system, although the D116H micropolymorphism is deeply buried and not directly accessible to a TCR.Alloreactive T cells are known to recognize a very diverse array of alloantigen-bound peptides (32, 33), so that virtually each T cell clone can be assumed to be specific for a distinct peptide. For this reason, the substantial correlation found in previous studies between peptide and the alloreactive T cell epitope sharing among HLA-B27 (reviewed in Ref. 34) or HLA-B14 subtypes (only 28.4% partial or full cross-reactivity, similar to peptide overlapping between the subtypes B*1402 and B*1403, see Ref. 19) supports a prominent role of peptides in determining alloreactive T cell cross-reaction, and it suggests that many shared ligands adopt antigenically similar conformations when bound to distinct HLA-B molecules. On the other hand, the results reported by Merino et al. (19) also demonstrate that the few CTL that cross-react with B*1402 and B*2705 did not exhibit cross-reactivity with B*1403, which is distinguished from B*1402 only by a single amino acid exchange in the α2-helix. Furthermore, they show that alloreactive CTL from various donors directed against B*2705 did not lyse cells expressing either B*1402 or B*1403, although the number of CTL tested might not have been high enough to detect a presumably low degree of cross-reactivity. Without structural data from HLA-B14 subtypes, however, these results are difficult to interpret.The pCatA peptide (IRAAPPPLF, derived from the signal sequence of cathepsin A, residues 2–10) is among the very few known common ligands of B*1402, B*2705 (19), and B*2709³ and can thus serve to study how a very different (B*1402) and two very similar subtypes (B*2705 and B*2709) handle a common ligand. On the other hand, the pLMP2 peptide is a proven natural ligand only of B*2705, whose possible presentation in vivo by B*2709 and HLA-B14 is not yet known, although this peptide can be complexed in vitro with B*2709 (24) and also with B*1402 (35). From previous crystallographic studies, it was known that pLMP2 is presented by the two HLA-B27 antigens in very different conformations (24). We expected that the pronounced sequence differences between B*1402 and the HLA-B27 alloantigens (Fig. 1) might even enhance the conformational dissimilarities that are observed when two very closely related subtypes such as B*2705 and B*2709 are compared. Discrepancies in peptide display could reasonably be expected to prevent CTL cross-reaction, so that pLMP2 might be considered as a representative of the vast majority of HLA-B14- and HLA-B27-presented ligands that must be responsible for the low degree of CTL cross-reactivity between these alloantigens. Despite these presumed differences between pCatA and pLMP2, both peptides may be seen as examples of ligands that could principally allow direct allorecognition.Here we report the crystal structures of B*1402·pCatA, B*2705·pCatA, B*2709·pCatA, and B*1402·pLMP2, and we compare them with each other and with the previously reported structures of B*2705·pLMP2 and B*2709·pLMP2 (24).