首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Separating Components of Variation in Survival of Mule Deer in Colorado
Authors:PAUL M LUKACS  GARY C WHITE  BRUCE E WATKINS  RICHARD H KAHN  BRADLEY A BANULIS  DARBY J FINLEY  A ANDREW HOLLAND  JUSTIN A MARTENS  JACK VAYHINGER
Institution:1. Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA;2. Colorado Division of Wildlife, 2300 S Townsend Avenue, Montrose, CO 81401, USA;3. Colorado Division of Wildlife, 317 W Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA;4. Colorado Division of Wildlife, P.O. Box 1181, Meeker, CO 81641, USA;5. Colorado Division of Wildlife, 151 E 16th Street, Durango, CO 81301, USA;6. Colorado Division of Wildlife, 346 Grand County Road 362, Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451, USA;7. Colorado Division of Wildlife, 7405 Highway 50, Salida, CO 81201, USA
Abstract:ABSTRACT Survival is an important parameter for understanding population dynamics of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and other large herbivores. To understand long-term dynamics it is important to separate sampling and biological process variation in survival. Moreover, knowledge of correlations in survival across space and between young and adults can provide more informed predictions of survival in unsampled areas. We estimated survival of fawn, yearling, and adult mule deer from 4 spatially separated regions of Colorado, USA, from 1997 to 2008. We also estimated process variance in survival across time for each age and site using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. Finally, we estimated correlations in survival among sites and ages with MCMC methods. Average winter fawn survival was 0.721 (SD = 0.024) for the 4 regions. Average winter adult female survival was 0.935 (SD = 0.007). Annual adult female survival ranged from 0.803 (SD = 0.017) to 0.900 (SD = 0.028) for the 4 regions, excluding hunting mortality. The correlation between fawn and adult female survival was high, 0.563 (SD = 0.253). Correlations in winter fawn survival were higher between populations at the same latitude than they were for populations to the north and south. We used survival estimates from our analysis to inform prior distributions for a Bayesian population dynamics model from one population in Colorado and compared that model to one with noninformative prior distributions. Population models including informative prior distributions based on our results performed better than those noninformative prior distributions on survival, providing more biologically defensible results when data were sparse. Knowledge of process distributions of survival can help wildlife managers better predict future population status and understand the likely range of survival rates.
Keywords:Bayesian estimators  Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)  mule deer  Odocoileus hemionus  population modeling  process variance  Program MARK  radiotelemetry  survival  variance components
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号