Profitable self-superparasitism in an infanticidal parasitoid when conspecifics are present: self-superparasitism deters later attackers from probing for infanticide

Abstract.  1. To reveal the profitability of self-superparasitism when conspecifics are present, the total combined fitness returns from the first and second ovipositions under triple parasitism were compared with fitness returns from the first oviposition under double parasitism, using the small brown hopper Laodelphax striatellus and its semi-solitary infanticidal parasitoid Echthrodelphax fairchildii .
2. The total combined survival rate of the first and second comers under triple parasitism with oviposition intervals of 1/24 h (where 1 and 24 h represent the first-to-second and second-to-third oviposition intervals respectively) was nearly double the survival rate of the first comer under double parasitism with a 25-h oviposition interval, although there was no difference between these triple and double parasitisms in terms of head width and developmental time. Under the conditions of other oviposition intervals, self-superparasitism produced null (1/1- and 24/24-h intervals) or negative fitness returns (24/1-h intervals). This suggests that self-superparasitism on hosts that were self-parasitised 1 h previously is profitable when conspecifics are present.
3. When the female parasitoid laid an egg on a host harbouring the earlier comer(s) on the non-oviposition side, she often probed the non-oviposition side for infanticide, i.e. killing the first offspring. When the first and second comers were on different sides, the probing frequency at the third oviposition in triple parasitism with 1/24-h oviposition intervals was lower than that at the second oviposition in double parasitism with a 25-h oviposition interval. This difference was responsible for the above difference in survival rate between the triple and double parasitisms.