Cavitation Resistance in Seedless Vascular Plants: The Structure and Function of Interconduit Pit Membranes

Plant water transport occurs through interconnected xylem conduits that are separated by partially digested regions in the cell wall known as pit membranes. These structures have a dual function. Their porous construction facilitates water movement between conduits while limiting the spread of air that may enter the conduits and render them dysfunctional during a drought. Pit membranes have been well studied in woody plants, but very little is known about their function in more ancient lineages such as seedless vascular plants. Here, we examine the relationships between conduit air seeding, pit hydraulic resistance, and pit anatomy in 10 species of ferns (pteridophytes) and two lycophytes. Air seeding pressures ranged from 0.8 ± 0.15 MPa (mean ± sd) in the hydric fern Athyrium filix-femina to 4.9 ± 0.94 MPa in Psilotum nudum, an epiphytic species. Notably, a positive correlation was found between conduit pit area and vulnerability to air seeding, suggesting that the rare-pit hypothesis explains air seeding in early-diverging lineages much as it does in many angiosperms. Pit area resistance was variable but averaged 54.6 MPa s m⁻¹ across all surveyed pteridophytes. End walls contributed 52% to the overall transport resistance, similar to the 56% in angiosperm vessels and 64% in conifer tracheids. Taken together, our data imply that, irrespective of phylogenetic placement, selection acted on transport efficiency in seedless vascular plants and woody plants in equal measure by compensating for shorter conduits in tracheid-bearing plants with more permeable pit membranes.Water transport in plants occurs under tension, which renders the xylem susceptible to air entry. This air seeding may lead to the rupture of water columns (cavitation) such that the air expands within conduits to create air-vapor embolisms that block further transport. (Zimmermann and Tyree, 2002). Excessive embolism such as that which occurs during a drought may jeopardize leaf hydration and lead to stomatal closure, overheating, wilting, and possibly death of the plant (Hubbard et al., 2001; Choat et al., 2012; Schymanski et al., 2013). Consequently, strong selection pressure resulted in compartmentalized and redundant plant vascular networks that are adapted to a species habitat water availability by way of life history strategy (i.e. phenology) or resistance to air seeding (Tyree et al., 1994; Mencuccini et al., 2010; Brodersen et al., 2012). The spread of drought-induced embolism is limited primarily by pit membranes, which are permeable, mesh-like regions in the primary cell wall that connect two adjacent conduits. The construction of the pit membrane is such that water easily moves across the membrane between conduits, but because of the small membrane pore size and the presence of a surface coating on the membrane (Pesacreta et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2012), the spread of air and gas bubbles is restricted up to a certain pressure threshold known as the air-seeding pressure (ASP). When xylem sap tension exceeds the air-seeding threshold, air can be aspirated from an air-filled conduit into a functional water-filled conduit through perhaps a large, preexisting pore or one that is created by tension-induced membrane stress (Rockwell et al., 2014). Air seeding leads to cavitation and embolism formation, with emboli potentially propagating throughout the xylem network (Tyree and Sperry, 1988; Brodersen et al., 2013). So, on the one hand, pit membranes are critical to controlling the spread of air throughout the vascular network, while on the other hand, they must facilitate the efficient flow of water between conduits (Choat et al., 2008; Domec et al., 2008; Pittermann et al., 2010; Schulte, 2012). Much is known about such hydraulic tradeoffs in the pit membranes of woody plants, but comparatively little data exist on seedless vascular plants such as ferns and lycophytes. Given that seedless vascular plants may bridge the evolutionary transition from bryophytes to woody plants, the lack of functional data on pit membrane structure in early-derived tracheophytes is a major gap in our understanding of the evolution of plant water transport.In woody plants, pit membranes fall into one of two categories: the torus-margo type found in most gymnosperms and the homogenous pit membrane characteristic of angiosperms (Choat et al., 2008; Choat and Pittermann, 2009). In conifers, water moves from one tracheid to another through the margo region of the membrane, with the torus sealing the pit aperture should one conduit become embolized. Air seeding occurs when water potential in the functional conduit drops low enough to dislodge the torus from its sealing position, letting air pass through the pit aperture into the water-filled tracheid (Domec et al., 2006; Delzon et al., 2010; Pittermann et al., 2010; Schulte, 2012; but see Jansen et al., 2012). Across north-temperate conifer species, larger pit apertures correlate with lower pit resistance to water flow (r_pit; MPa s m⁻¹), but it is the ratio of torus-aperture overlap that sets a species cavitation resistance (Pittermann et al., 2006, 2010; Domec et al., 2008; Hacke and Jansen, 2009). A similar though mechanistically different tradeoff exists in angiosperm pit membranes. Here, air seeding reflects a probabilistic relationship between membrane porosity and the total area of pit membranes present in the vessel walls. Specifically, the likelihood of air aspirating into a functional conduit is determined by the combination of xylem water potential and the diameter of the largest pore and/or the weakest zone in the cellulose matrix in the vessel’s array of pit membranes (Wheeler et al., 2005; Hacke et al., 2006; Christman et al., 2009; Rockwell et al., 2014). As it has come to be known, the rare-pit hypothesis suggests that the infrequent, large-diameter leaky pore giving rise to that rare pit reflects some combination of pit membrane traits such as variation in conduit membrane area (large or small), membrane properties (tight or porous), and hydrogel membrane chemistry (Hargrave et al., 1994; Choat et al., 2003; Wheeler et al., 2005; Hacke et al., 2006; Christman et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2012; Plavcová et al., 2013; Rockwell et al., 2014). The maximum pore size is critical because, per the Young-Laplace law, the larger the radius of curvature, the lower the air-water pressure difference under which the contained meniscus will fail (Jarbeau et al., 1995; Choat et al., 2003; Jansen et al., 2009). Consequently, angiosperms adapted to drier habitats may exhibit thicker, denser, smaller, and less abundant pit membranes than plants occupying regions with higher water availability (Wheeler et al., 2005; Hacke et al., 2007; Jansen et al., 2009; Lens et al., 2011; Scholz et al., 2013). However, despite these qualitative observations, there is no evidence that increased cavitation resistance arrives at the cost of higher r_pit. Indeed, the bulk of the data suggest that prevailing pit membrane porosity is decoupled from the presence of the single largest pore that allows air seeding to occur (Choat et al., 2003; Wheeler et al., 2005 Hacke et al., 2006, 2007).As water moves from one conduit to another, pit membranes offer considerable hydraulic resistance throughout the xylem network. On average, r_pit contributes 64% and 56% to transport resistance in conifers and angiosperms, respectively (Wheeler et al., 2005; Pittermann et al., 2006; Sperry et al., 2006). In conifers, the average r_pit is estimated at 6 ± 1 MPa s m⁻¹, almost 60 times lower than the 336 ± 81 MPa s m⁻¹ computed for angiosperms (Wheeler et al., 2005; Hacke et al., 2006; Sperry et al., 2006). Presumably, the high porosity of conifer pits compensates for the higher transport resistance offered by a vascular system composed of narrow, short, single-celled conduits (Pittermann et al., 2005; Sperry et al., 2006).Transport in seedless vascular plants presents an interesting conundrum because, with the exception of a handful of species, their primary xylem is composed of tracheids, the walls of which are occupied by homogenous pit membranes (Gibson et al., 1985; Carlquist and Schneider, 2001, 2007; but see Morrow and Dute, 1998, for torus-margo membranes in Botrychium spp.). At first pass, this combination of traits appears hydraulically maladaptive, but several studies have shown that ferns can exhibit transport capacities that are on par with more recently evolved plants (Wheeler et al., 2005; Watkins et al., 2010; Pittermann et al., 2011, 2013; Brodersen et al., 2012). Certainly, several taxa possess large-diameter, highly overlapping conduits, some even have vessels such as Pteridium aquilinum and many species have high conduit density, all of which could contribute to increased hydraulic efficiency (Wheeler et al., 2005; Pittermann et al., 2011, 2013). But how do the pit membranes of seedless vascular plants compare? Scanning electron micrographs of fern and lycopod xylem conduits suggest that they are thin, diaphanous, and susceptible to damage during specimen preparation (Carlquist and Schneider 2001, 2007). Consistent with such observations, two estimates of r_pit imply that r_pit in ferns may be significantly lower than in angiosperms; Wheeler et al. (2005) calculated r_pit in the fern Pteridium aquilinum at 31 MPa s m⁻¹, while Schulte et al. (1987) estimated r_pit at 1.99 MPa s m⁻¹ in the basal fern Psilotum nudum. The closest structural analogy to seedless vascular plant tracheids can be found in the secondary xylem of the early-derived vesselless angiosperms, in which tracheids possess homogenous pit membranes with r_pit values that at 16 MPa s m⁻¹ are marginally higher than those of conifers (Hacke et al., 2007). Given that xylem in seedless vascular plants is functionally similar to that in vesselless angiosperms, we expected convergent r_pit values in these two groups despite their phylogenetic distance. We tested this hypothesis, as well as the intrinsic cavitation resistance of conduits in seedless vascular plants, by scrutinizing the pit membranes of ferns and fern allies using the anatomical and experimental approaches applied previously to woody taxa. In particular, we focused on the relationship between pit membrane traits and cavitation resistance at the level of the individual conduit.