Long-Term Monitoring of Waterborne Pathogens and Microbial Source Tracking Markers in Paired Agricultural Watersheds under Controlled and Conventional Tile Drainage Management |
| |
| Authors: | Graham Wilkes Julie Brassard Thomas A. Edge Victor Gannon Natalie Gottschall Cassandra C. Jokinen Tineke H. Jones Izhar U. H. Khan Romain Marti Mark D. Sunohara Edward Topp David R. Lapen |
| |
| Affiliation: | aAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada;bAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada;cWater Science & Technology, Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada;dLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada;eAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada;fAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, London, Ontario, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | Surface waters from paired agricultural watersheds under controlled tile drainage (CTD) and uncontrolled tile drainage (UCTD) were monitored over 7 years in order to determine if there was an effect of CTD (imposed during the growing season) on occurrences and loadings of bacterial and viral pathogens, coliphages, and microbial source tracking markers. There were significantly lower occurrences of human, ruminant, and livestock (ruminant plus pig) Bacteroidales markers in the CTD watershed in relation to the UCTD watershed. As for pathogens, there were significantly lower occurrences of Salmonella spp. and Arcobacter spp. in the CTD watershed. There were no instances where there were significantly higher quantitative loadings of any microbial target in the CTD watershed, except for F-specific DNA (F-DNA) and F-RNA coliphages, perhaps as a result of fecal inputs from a hobby farm independent of the drainage practice treatments. There was lower loading of the ruminant marker in the CTD watershed in relation to the UCTD system, and results were significant at the level P = 0.06. The odds of Salmonella spp. occurring increased when a ruminant marker was present relative to when the ruminant marker was absent, yet for Arcobacter spp., the odds of this pathogen occurring significantly decreased when a ruminant marker was present relative to when the ruminant marker was absent (but increased when a wildlife marker was present relative to when the wildlife marker was absent). Interestingly, the odds of norovirus GII (associated with human and swine) occurring in water increased significantly when a ruminant marker was present relative to when a ruminant marker was absent. Overall, this study suggests that fecal pollution from tile-drained fields to stream could be reduced by CTD utilization. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
