Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies

In the literature on dominance hierarchies, "winner" and "loser"effects usually are denned as an increased probability of winningat time T, bated on victories at time T-l, T-2, etc, and anincreased probability of losing at time T, based on losing atT-1, T-2, etc., respectively. Despite some early theoreticalwork on winner and loser effects, these factors and how theyaffect the structure of dominance hierarchies have not beenexamined in detail. I developed a computer simulation to examinewinner and loser effects when such effects are independent ofone another (as well as when they interact) and when combatantsassess each other's resource-holding power. When winner effectsalone were important, a hierarchy in which all individuals heldan unambiguous rank was found. When only loser effects wereimportant, a dear alpha individual always emerged, but the rankof others in the group was often unclear because of the scarcityof aggressive interactions. Increasing winner effects for agiven value of the loser effect increase the number of individualswith unambiguous positions in a hierarchy and the converse istrue for increasing the value of the loser effect for a givenwinner effect Although winner and loser effects have been documentedin a number of species, no study has documented both winnerand loser effects (using some controlled, pairwise testing system)and the detailed nature of behavioral interactions when individualsare in groups. I hope the results of this model will spur suchstudies in the future.