首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Requiring more empirical studies in ecology: A comparison of sample size in meta-analysis of ecology and medicine
Authors:Zhanhuan Shang
Affiliation:School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
Abstract:Meta-analysis is an effective and popular tool for studies of systemic literature or research cases review. Compared with medicine, the ecological publications with meta-analysis typically addressed more questions, but with a less datasets. Therefore, in ecology the meta-analysis method should have higher credibility as it does in medicine. For the future of meta-analysis in ecology, the more important work is to implement more empirical studies, such as ‘coordinated distributed experiment’, to get more reliable datasets.
Keywords:Systemic review  Sample size  Coordinated distributed experiment  Reliable datasets
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号