Natural Attenuation Rate Clarifications: The True Picture is in the Details

The term “Natural Attenuation” (NA) has been defined as naturally occurring processes in soil and groundwater environments that act without human intervention to reduce the mass, toxicity, mobility, volume, or concentration of contaminants in those media. Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) protocols generally involve the collection of biogeochemical data from groundwater monitoring wells at sites. The data are correlated in time and space with the various chemicals of concern (COC's) to establish predominant biodegradation mechanisms. Modelers using the first-order decay expression typically use the rate coefficient as a calibration parameter and adjust it until the transport model results match field data. With this approach, uncertainties with a number of parameters (e.g., dispersion, sorption, biodegradation, etc.) are lumped together in a single calibration parameter. The problems associated with the lumped parameter approach are illustrated using two commonly used models, BIOSCREEN and Buscheck/Alcantar Analytical Solution, in a variety of practical examples. The natural attenuation decay rate estimated using the lumped parameter approach is distinguished from a biodegradation rate established by isolating processes and examining biodegradation lines of evidence. The half-life determined from empirical data using the lumped parameter approach is often mistakenly interchanged with a biodegradation half-life when it is an all-encompassing half-life based on the interaction of numerous processes. Isolation of the processes, as they are represented in the governing transport equation, and a rationale approach at parameter estimation to avoid the potential pitfalls of the all-inclusive “attenuation rate,” are provided. In closing, it is imperative to implement the following steps to dissern lumped process degradation rates from biodegradation half-lives: (a) be sure the rate/half-life processes are clarified as to what they encompass, (b) establish exactly how the rate/half-life was determined, (c) make certain other processes, such as dispersion, were estimated correctly, and (d) if the half-life is presented as a first-order biodegradation rate, examine the available lines of evidence to substantiate it.