| Abstract: | The rate-limiting step in diphtheria toxin (DT) intoxication of Vero cells has been determined utilizing cycloheximide as an inhibitor of the intoxication process. Cycloheximide is shown to inhibit the toxin catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of elongation factor 2 (EF-2). The inhibition is blocked by puromycin thus establishing the ribosome as the location of cycloheximide protection. Washing cells free of cycloheximide rapidly reverses the protective effect. The initial rates of protein synthesis inhibition observed after removal of cycloheximide from DT-intoxicated cells are 5 to 12-fold greater than rates observed in unprotected cells and are shown to reflect ADP-ribosylation of EF-2 by cytosolic DT. Ten to thirty minutes after cycloheximide removal, the rate of protein synthesis inhibition abruptly changes to values identical to those of unprotected cells. Both the initial rates and extent of the initial rapid inactivation are directly related to toxin concentration and time of incubation with DT in the presence of cycloheximide. We concluded that: the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis inhibition by DT is not the ADP-ribosylation of EF-2 by cytosolic toxin but rather the earlier entry step of DT into the cytosol. DT enters the cytosol as a bolus of sufficient size to rapidly inactivate all EF-2 in that cell. It is inferred from 1 and 2 that the first order inactivation rate exhibited by DT is the result of the probability of the release of a bolus of toxin to the cytosol of any cell in the population per unit time. Autoradiographic analysis of intoxicated cell populations support this two-population state model. The size of a single bolus or quantum of DT is calculated from data over the range of 10(-11) to 10(-9) M DT and is found to remain constant. We suggest that the cytosolic entry mechanism of DT results from a unique ability of the internalized toxin molecules to destabilize the vesicular membrane resulting in a random release of a bolus of toxin into the cytosol. Because the bolus size remains constant over a 50-fold change in receptor occupancy the possibility is raised that DT undergoes a post-receptor packaging process, package size remaining a constant and package number increasing with receptor occupancy. |
