| Abstract: | A number of studies conducted in the last decade showed that saturable ('specific') binding, by itself, does not necessarily imply biological significance. That is, biological ligands were shown to bind to inert materials as well as to biological receptors in a saturable manner. In these studies specific binding was operationally defined as binding that was displaceable by excess concentrations of unlabeled ligand. This method of measuring specific binding is now no longer considered optimal. To investigate whether optimal (computer-assisted) techniques of measuring specific binding--namely, nonlinear least-squares curve fitting of total binding data, with mathematical separation of the total binding into its various components--might ensure biological significance of measured specific binding, we studied the binding of high-density lipoproteins (HDL3) to tissue culture dishes as an example of binding without biological significance. This binding closely followed the paradigm of a ligand interacting with a class of homogeneous, saturable sites and with a class of relatively unsaturable sites, just as it would have if the HDL3 were interacting with an unpurified biological receptor. This finding indicates that computer-assisted analysis, while most accurately describing binding data, nevertheless does not ensure that measured specific binding has biological significance. Saturability is such a nonselective feature of equilibrium binding data that it should probably no longer be considered one of the criteria for deciding whether or not a defined binding site is a receptor. |
