Driftnet fishery threats sea turtles in the Atlantic Ocean |
| |
Authors: | Fernando N. Fiedler Gilberto Sales Bruno B. Giffoni Emygdio L. A. Monteiro-Filho Eduardo R. Secchi Leandro Bugoni |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Funda??o Pró-TAMAR,Itajaí,Brazil;2.Centro de Estudos do Mar (CEM), Pós Gradua??o em Sistemas Costeiros e Oceanicos (PGSISCO),Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR),Pontal do Paraná,Brazil;3.Centro Nacional de Prote??o e Pesquisa das Tartarugas Marinhas (Projeto TAMAR),Instituto Chico Mendes de Conserva??o da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO),Cama?ari,Brazil;4.Funda??o Pró-TAMAR,Ubatuba,Brazil;5.Departamento de Zoologia,Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Centro Politécnico,Curitiba,Brazil;6.Instituto de Pesquisas Cananéia (IPeC),Cananéia,Brazil;7.Instituto de Oceanografia, Laboratório de Tartarugas e Mamíferos Marinhos,Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG),Rio Grande,Brazil;8.Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Aves Aquáticas,Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG),Rio Grande,Brazil |
| |
Abstract: | Fisheries are recognised as a major threat to sea turtles worldwide. Oceanic driftnets are considered the main cause of the steep decline in Pacific Ocean populations of the leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea. The world’s largest leatherback population nests in West Africa and migrates across the Atlantic Ocean to feed off the South American coast. There, the turtles encounter a range of fisheries, including the Brazilian driftnet fishery targeting hammerhead sharks. From 2002 to 2008, 351 sea turtles were incidentally caught in 41 fishing trips and 371 sets. Leatherbacks accounted for 77.3% of the take (n = 252 turtles, capture rate = 0.1405 turtles/km of net), followed by loggerheads Caretta caretta (47 individuals, capture rate = 0.0262 turtles/km of net), green turtles Chelonia mydas (27 individuals, capture rate = 0.0151 turtles/km of net) and unidentified hard-shelled turtles (25 individual, capture rate = 0.0139 turtles/km of net) that fell off the net during hauling. Immediate mortality (i.e., turtles that were dead upon reaching the vessel, excluding post-release mortality) was similar among the species and accounted for 22.2 to 29.4% of turtles hauled onboard. The annual catch by this fishery ranged from 1,212 to 6,160 leatherback turtles, as estimated based on bootstrap procedures under different fishing effort scenarios in the 1990s. The present inertia in law and enforcement regarding gillnet regulations in Brazil could result in the reestablishment of the driftnet fishery, driving rates of leatherback mortality to levels similar to those observed in previous decades. This development could potentially lead to the collapse of the South Atlantic leatherback population, mirroring the decline of the species in the Pacific. In light of these potential impacts and similar threats to other pelagic mega fauna, we recommend banning this type of fishery in the region. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|