A comparison of explicitly unpaired treatment and extinction: recovery of sign-tracking within a context renewal design

The present experiment compared the effectiveness of explicitly unpaired treatment and extinction in preventing the recovery of sign-tracking within a context renewal design. Three groups of rats were first trained on a sign-tracking procedure in Context A where insertions of a retractable lever were paired with food. In a second phase, the sign-tracking response was eliminated. One group received standard extinction of the CS in Context B, while another group received explicitly unpaired treatment in Context B where food was presented only during inter-trial intervals (and not paired with the lever). A third group received this explicitly unpaired treatment in Context A. After the sign-tracking response was eliminated, all groups received a test session in Context A where the lever was presented alone and no food was delivered at any time. Significantly more responding occurred in the group that received explicitly unpaired treatment in Context B than in either of the other groups. This demonstrates that there are situations where explicitly unpaired treatment is less effective than extinction in preventing the reappearance of previously eliminated responding.