首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Stand height and cover type complement forest age structure as a biodiversity indicator in boreal and northern temperate forest management
Affiliation:1. Centre d’Étude de la Forêt, and Faculté de foresterie, de géographie et de géomatique, Université Laval, 2405 rue de la Terrasse, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada;2. Centre for Forest Research (CFR), TELUQ, Université du Québec, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada;3. Direction de la recherche forestière, Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs, 2700, rue Einstein, QC G1P 3W8, Canada;1. Département de géographie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada;2. Environment Canada, Science and Technology Branch, Montréal, Québec, Canada;3. Direction de la recherche forestière, Forêt Québec, Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune du Québec, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada;4. Ouranos, Montréal, Québec, Canada;1. MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Alkotmány út 2–4, H-2163 Vácrátót, Hungary;2. Department of Botany, Institute of Biology, Szent István University, P.O. Box 2, H-1400 Budapest, Hungary;3. Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Institute of Environmental and Landscape Management, Szent István University, Páter Károly út 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary;4. Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary;5. Department of Forest Site Diagnosis and Classification, University of West-Hungary, Ady út 5, H-9400 Sopron, Hungary;6. Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014 Helsinki, Finland;1. Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Normal University, 1 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China;2. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, 1 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China;3. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;4. State Key Lab of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;5. Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA;6. School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Section of Soil & Crop Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;1. Northwest A&F University, College of Landscape Architecture and Arts, CN-712100 Yangling, China;2. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden;3. University of Copenhagen, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark;4. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Resource Management, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden;5. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden;1. Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, UK;2. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK;3. Identification and Naming, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, UK;4. Forest Soils and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland;5. Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland;6. Department of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants (with Herbarium), Georg August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Abstract:Forest age structure is one of the main indicators of biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests worldwide. This indicator was mainly chosen for the conservation of a subset of rare or sensitive species related to the oldest age classes, not to capture variability across the entire biodiversity spectrum, but is often considered as such. In this study, we analysed alpha and beta diversity in temporary plots of western Quebec, Canada, to consider biodiversity indicators complementary to existing forest age structure targets. Our analysis revealed that considered individually, stand characteristics such as cover type and height are better predictors of changes in site-level contribution to tree beta diversity than age. We also show that plots belonging to different age classes can be similar in terms of tree alpha diversity. Height class was found to have a more significant impact on tree alpha diversity than expected: height was more important than age in coniferous forests, and in deciduous and mixedwood stands it frequently complemented age in explaining the observed diversity patterns. Our results suggest that forest age structure target levels should not be used as the sole indicator of ecosystem sustainability, and that some mature secondary stands can provide significant contributions to biodiversity. We propose that more efficient trade-offs between forest exploitation, ecosystem functioning and environmental conservation can be attained if: (i) forest age structure targets are complemented by cover type and stand height; or (ii) complementary biodiversity indicators of ecosystem sustainability are implemented.
Keywords:Ecosystem sustainability  Functional diversity  Alpha diversity  Beta diversity  Ecosystem functioning
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号