首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Cost-effectiveness of managing Natura 2000 sites: an exploratory study for Finland,Germany, the Netherlands and Poland
Authors:Frank Wätzold  Melanie Mewes  Rob van Apeldoorn  Riku Varjopuro  Tadeusz Jan Chmielewski  Frank Veeneklaas  Marja-Leena Kosola
Institution:(1) Faculty of Law and Economics and Institute for Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Grimmer Strasse 88, 17487 Greifswald, Germany;(2) Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ, Permoser Strasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany;(3) Centre Landscape, Alterra Wageningen UR, Post Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;(4) Research Programme for Environmental Policy, Finnish Environment Institute, Mechelininkatu 34, 00260 Helsinki, Finland;(5) Department of Landscape Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Dobrzanskiego 37 St, 20-262 Lublin, Poland
Abstract:Natura 2000 sites are expected to assure the long-term survival of Europe’s most valuable and threatened species and habitats. It follows that successful management of the sites is of great importance. Next to goal attainment, cost-effectiveness is increasingly recognised as a key requirement for gaining social and political acceptance for costly conservation measures. We identify and qualitatively examine issues of cost-effectiveness related to the design and implementation of management measures in Natura 2000 sites in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Poland. Given the wide variety of management design and implementation options within the four countries, our study is purely of an exploratory nature. We derive recommendations for improving the cost-effectiveness of management in Natura 2000 sites and for future research. Examples of policy recommendations include guaranteeing the availability of funds for longer periods, and ensuring the appropriate allocation of funds between the different tasks of designing and implementing management plans. Further research should examine the cost-effectiveness of controversial suggestions such as, for example, more tailored payment schemes for conservation measures that result in higher ecological outputs but are costly to administer. Moreover, more research is needed to better understand how rules for administrations, as well as rules and governance structures for tasks within administrations, should be designed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号